kurt765 wrote:Here's what it looks like:
marzipano wrote:I'm talking here about "average" original photos taken hand-held on automatic with a budget priced pocket digital camera (I use a Nikon Coolpix 7900 At 7.1 MPixels res). I accept that using a tripod with a motorised head and full manual controls will always give much better results but There is a large market for a good quality panorama product that gives acceptable results on "everyday" photos
renan wrote:The English version must come soon.
'[bo wrote:'Re: PDF version, maybe someone at Kolor should look at WIKI-to-PDF solutions like PediaPress or HTMLDoc?
'[bo wrote:']Still, if any of you, fellow Autopano users, had to choose between:
1) faster development and deployment of new features and bug fixes
2) better documented features and more testing before releases
What would you choose? I'd go with 1) any day!
I think it's better to have daily/weekly builds with poor documentation, while the official stable releases (like 2.0, 2.5, etc) should take more time and arrive with complete documentation.
Re: PDF version, maybe someone at Kolor should look at WIKI-to-PDF solutions like PediaPress or HTMLDoc?
'[bo wrote:']Still, if any of you, fellow Autopano users, had to choose between:
1) faster development and deployment of new features and bug fixes
2) better documented features and more testing before releases
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest