~$1500 Camera + Lense Reocmendation  

In the panorama field, hardware is also part of the success. You can discuss here about it: camera, computer, pano head, anything
no avatar
spinningcog
New member
 
Topic author
Posts: 1
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 9:22 pm
Info

~$1500 Camera + Lense Reocmendation

by spinningcog » Fri May 29, 2009 9:27 pm

I want to spend a combined total of ~$1500 for a DSLR body + Lense for use with an Orion head to take landscape panoramas, I'd appreciate any recommendations.

I've thought about the Panasonic GH1 which comes with 14-140mm/F4.0-5.8 ASPH./MEGA O.I.S. Lense, would that be suitable?

Other than that the Canon Ti1 looks like a good body to me... Open to suggestions

no avatar
bigwade
Member
 
Posts: 282
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:34 am
Location: NL
Info

by bigwade » Sat May 30, 2009 2:19 am

second hand 5D + 17-40

User avatar
[bo]
Member
 
Posts: 1226
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:16 am
Location: Bulgaria
Info

by [bo] » Sat May 30, 2009 9:59 am

I second that proposal. If you want lighter body - 450D/500D will do.
Some of my panoramas, posted in the Autopano Pro flickr group.

User avatar
fma38
Moderator
 
Posts: 5850
Likes: 2 posts
Liked in: 2 posts
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 6:21 pm
Location: Grenoble, France
Info

by fma38 » Sat May 30, 2009 12:58 pm

Frédéric

no avatar
GURL
Member
 
Posts: 2943
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: Grenoble
Info

by GURL » Sat May 30, 2009 6:14 pm


A very seducing price for such a fine camera, but what about the lense(s) cost ?

The Panasonic GH1 (and Panasonic G1) are smaller and lighter cameras (a significant plus for motorized panohead ?) with fine lenses (the 14-140mm/F4.0-5.8 ASPH is a fine equivalent to a 28-280 mm zoom for FF cameras!) Those 4/3 sensor cameras have a lower pixel count (not a severe problem for stitched panos) and are not good at high ISO (just use a slower speed setting.)

Besides that, the difference in dynamic range (like for any Canon DSLR, the 5D dynamic range is higly appraised) could make the decision...

Using smaller, lighter and less expensive DSLR rather than large, heavy and very expensive FF cameras and lenses for stitched panos should make sense because pixel count and high ISO are not real problems for that. But the truth is I replaced my nice bridge camera with a 4/3 Olympus DSLR because noise and low dynamic range were a plague and some years latter didn't resist to get one of the Fuji F5 available as a bargain because of its noticeable dynamic range...
Georges


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron