usecatchyname wrote:KOLOR TEAM ----
Listen and read very carefully.. you are NOT answering the questions we have, instead dancing around the topic like blind mice.
Listen:
1. the preview of the panorama in autopano pro shows the stich is PERFECT when in combined view within green box
2. the control points have been added and stitched correctly
3. panorama has been re-optimized
4. preview has been re-blended
5. rendered panorama again
6. THERE ARE STICHING ERRORS THAT ARE NOT PRESENT IN THE PREVIEW - FIX THIS!!!!
Otherwise provide a workaround for all your paying customers.
I've used 126 photos in HDR, converted to 42 photos, then imported 42 photos in to Autopano Pro, spent the entire day adding control points and rendering over and over again with this stupid software that is clearly full of bugs, and NOT rendering what is being shown in the blended rendered preview.... I am more direct than the other posters and have come across at least 5 posts with the exact same issue, NONE of which have been solved since 2015. WHY?
Very frustrating... FIX IT! or provide a workaround!
Thanks.
marzipano wrote:I seem to recall a lengthy discussion on this very topic with Kolor a few years ago
As I recall the preview you get whist in the editor and checking for errors, masking, blending etc. is a cut down version of the final render. This is usually because the preview is only processing the data visible in the screen at that time or is just a "quick" attempt at a render
This is very evident if you use the +/- magnification buttons on the preview screen and watch stitching errors appear and disappear as the visible area changes.
The final render is holistic and thorough whereas previews are in effect partial renders and do not take into account all the "variables" in the whole pano
When the original thread was being discussed I seem to remember Kolor saying that in principle we could have the full render as a preview option BUT users would need to be aware in would be very slow compared to the current preview (i.e take as long as a "real" render). I was in favour of this but the majority were not IIRC !!
Sorry - not a solution to the current issue but just my recollection of the previous discussion
Martin
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest