mediavets wrote:klausesser wrote:Well - and what´s that supposed to tell us in terms of the issue we talk about here?![]()
best, Klausmediavets wrote:It tells us that PTGui is no longer simply a GUI-front end to Panorama Tools and has not been for many years now. It now incorporates ideas from many other sources.klausesser wrote:Ok - i choose the wrong words, sory: i didn´t mean that PTGui today still is "just" a GUI for the PanoTools.
P.S.: you see - when PTGui can deal perfectly wit the lens without banding - why would APG fail?mediavets wrote:Because PTGui incorporates vignetting correction and APG does not (yet); it also has different colour correction and blending systems/'engines'.
lumelix wrote:Hallo Klaus
Ich habe hier keine Lust, mich zu streiten, was bei mir passiert oder nicht.
lumelix wrote:Geben wir hier doch Robert erst mal Gelegenheit, die vielen Anregungen auszutesten und schauen dann, was zum Ziel führt, ja ? Sonst verliert er auch noch den Überblick.
klausesser wrote:btw.: are you living in Australia? Did we get in contact via Josef?
Boley wrote:There are many options to try and sometimes the only way is to eliminate or confirm suspicions. Do you think that either more or less overlapping may help in this instance?
lumelix wrote:Das Stitching und die Passpunktdetection wurde klar verbessert in dieser Version. Leider führt das auch dazu, dass ich erst mal die Settings richtig einstellen musste, damit er mir alte Test-Panoramen von damals richtig zusammen setzt. Wie immer fehlt bei all den tollen neuen Features total das Manual, respektive sogar die Begriffserklärung. Z.B. bei der Optimierung gibt es jede Menge (nicht ins Deutsche übersetzte) neue Modelle und Methoden mit völlig unverständlichen Bezeichnungen. Ich hatte Glück und habe gleich die "richtigen Knöpfe" gedrückt, rein intuitiv! weil ich diese Kiste doch schon etwas kenne. Wenn du Pech hast, kannst Du da tagelang rumprobieren ohne Erfolg.
Nun frage ich mich halt wirklich, warum ich diese Software wohl hunderte von Stunden ausgetestet habe und immer wieder aufwändige Bug-Reports mit vielen Bildern und Hinweisen geliefert habe, wenn das Zeug halt immer noch nicht funktioniert. Bringt doch nix, wenn die immer mehr Features reinpacken, aber die essentiellen Dinge wie das Blending funktionieren überhaupt nicht.
lumelix wrote:I found, that a good value is 25%. If you have a lens with a big aperture (and also more vignetting) like this f1.4 85mm, 30% overlapping can result in better Panoramas. It's simple because you need less area from the Corners which have some vignetting.
Boley wrote:Hi Klaus, it is the same Robert and I have been in contact with you through Josef. Josef is still working on the problem which appears to be very baffling.
Boley wrote:... , yes there still appears to be some vignetting but quite minor, certainly better than without the correction.
lumelix wrote:I never saw a f1.4 lens totally without vignetting.
lumelix wrote:Perhaps there are also differences between some lenses. Or he use a special sunshade that will cause the vignetting. I remember that I do so as I shot a GIGA with deep standing sun.
Boley wrote:Thanks for doing the tests Klaus.
Boley wrote:Tried both front and rear curtain
lumelix wrote:As I wrote, there is allways vignetting on a f1.4 lens, even at f8 or f11. You couldn't see it in a single Image, but with a pano and blue sky, it's really visible.
Boley wrote:Hi Klaus, I have tried it with or without GPS and the problem still exists.
In regards to the lens, there is a UV filter on it, I wouldn't think that would cause it but I will try it without next time.
Boley wrote:In regards to the lens, there is a UV filter on it, I wouldn't think that would cause it but I will try it without next time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests