Page 1 of 1

BETTER FOR BULK PRODUCTION

PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 2:03 am
by itsrichphoto
I WOULD LIKE THE AUTO STITCHER TO WORK BETTER. I SIMPLY WOULDNT USE IT! PERHAPS HAVE AN ALGORITHM THAT RECOGNISES SIMILAR FILE NAMES?

I CREATE GENERALLY 50 PANORAMAS AT A TIME - JUST IN CASE IT CRASHES AND I HAVE TO START AGAIN. WHAT WOULD BE USEFUL IS RATHER THAN HAVING THUMBNAILS OF EACH IMAGE (THE BUILDER PRE STITCHED WINDOW) HAVE FILE NAMES. OR AT LEAST SMALL THUMBS. THAT WAY I CAN SEE MORE THAN 4 GROUPS ON A SCREEN AT A TIME.

THE PRO VERSION SEEMS SET-UP FOR PEOPLE ONLY CREATING 10 IMAGES AT A TIME.

=D

Re: BETTER FOR BULK PRODUCTION

PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:48 am
by Cliquetsy
WHY MUST YOU SHOUT THE IDEA IN MY HEAD?


Otherwise, neat idea.

Re: BETTER FOR BULK PRODUCTION

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:07 am
by HansKeesom
I am using APG for bulk, often more the 10 panoramas. APG is doing fine there. Just need to be carefull with the settings for the nr of photos in each panorama and the max nr of seconds between each photo.

To deal with crashes it is wise to do have APG do just one thing at a time, so no auto render, to turn on autosave, and everynow and then save the entire workspace.

Alternatively you send all the files to me and I do things for you ;-)

Re: BETTER FOR BULK PRODUCTION

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 5:19 pm
by itsrichphoto
thanks for that! I think ill do better working faster though...

Re: BETTER FOR BULK PRODUCTION

PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:37 am
by HansKeesom
I am doing a 38 panorama project at the moment.
I had to change the nr seconds between each pano because the were close together.

Of course I did save workspace every now and then but so far no crashes.
APG helps a lot when you use the right workflow.

Re: BETTER FOR BULK PRODUCTION

PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 10:45 pm
by HansKeesom