Nouveau 320 gigapixels panorama de Londre  

Share what you've done with Autopano Pro.
Montrez nous vos oeuvres !
no avatar
magphil
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:51 pm

Nouveau 320 gigapixels panorama de Londre

by magphil » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:37 am

Voici le Lien.

Ils ne parlent pas du soft utilisé.

User avatar
AlexandreJ
Kolor Team
 
Posts: 5920
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:56 pm
Location: Francin, France

by AlexandreJ » Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:44 am

autopano giga, bien sur :)

User avatar
taf
Member
 
Posts: 2680
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:13 am
Location: Paaaaaaris !

by taf » Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:53 am

Un énorme record pour la team Kolor, car franchement, chapeau pour le soft !!!
Par contre, surement aussi un record du pano le plus moche qui soit, avec un autre record : le plus gros ciel gris du monde ;-)
Look. There's a rhythmic ceremonial ritual coming up !

no avatar
magphil
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:51 pm

by magphil » Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:13 pm


no avatar
gddxb
Member
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:07 am

by gddxb » Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:52 pm

Hope you don't mind the switch into English...

There are a number of problems with this one. But the two key ones are as follows:

Firstly, it's not a single panorama - there are 5 images here. One at 27 gigapixels (of which 50% are faked), and 4 larger ones.

Secondly, the 4 larger panoramas (in pixel size) are NOT stitched together. These 4 larger images are 105GP, 93GP, 88GP and 86GP.

There is no world record here. Any claims of such are disingenuous in the extreme.

no avatar
gddxb
Member
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:07 am

by gddxb » Wed Mar 13, 2013 5:13 pm

In addition to the above, the optical resolution of what is presented is of the order of 40 gigapixels:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10151565323466412.1073741825.602476411&type=1

Is anyone who was involved in this prepared to explain what actually went wrong?

I'm not doubting 48,000 images were shot for this.

But there is no evidence presented anywhere that they were actually successfully stitched and rendered at full resolution.

I can't imagine that Canon would be too pleased about the image quality supposedly coming out of one of their >$11K lenses...
Last edited by gddxb on Wed Mar 13, 2013 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Return to Panorama gallery / Galerie de panoramas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: oreillyfotograf and 2 guests