Image-stitching and virtual tour solutions My account Updates
It is currently Tue Sep 16, 2014 1:54 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:27 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 115
What is the maximum size for export wide in PTP1.5B2 OSX64 trial Version and in the final version, because my Panoramas are about 4 times smaller in PTP.



_________________
Visit my page
http://suuperguut.com/ http://suuperguut.at/ http://suuperguut.de/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:36 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:00 am
Posts: 199
Location: Francin
Panotour export max width is 2879x2879 (Flash limitation).

_________________
--
Yann G.
www.kolor.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:52 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:18 am
Posts: 7729
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
ygilquin wrote:
Panotour export max width is 2879x2879 (Flash limitation).

"Partial pano width" . . . it was "cubeface-size" before? Or what does it mean?

I usually have 3184px as cubeface-size when i use 10000x5000px images.
And i use 512 for "cutting size".

best,. Klaus

_________________
Simplicity is the keynote of all true elegance. Coco Chanel


Last edited by klausesser on Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:14 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13949
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
ygilquin wrote:
Panotour export max width is 2879x2879 (Flash limitation).

Yes, but that doesn't really answer his question.

He is talking about the max value one can assign to the 'Partial panorama width' value/variable for partial panos.

2879x2879 is not a value one could enter here is it?

This is not the same thing as the 'Cube face size' value/variable for equirectangular 360x180 panos.

_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Last edited by mediavets on Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13949
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
klausesser wrote:
ygilquin wrote:
Panotour export max width is 2879x2879 (Flash limitation).

"Partial pano width" . . . it was "cubeface-size" before? Or what does it mean?

I usually have 3184px as cubeface-size when i use 10000x5000px images.
And i use 512 for "cutting size".

best,. Klaus

Partial panos - those witha pano FOV of less than 360x180 - are handled diferently from panos with 360x180 pano FOV in PT/PTP.

The settings dialogue panels for each type is different.

For partial panos witha pano FOV of less than 360x180 - see screenshot 1.

For 360x180 pano FOV panos - see screenshot 2.





_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Last edited by mediavets on Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:02 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:18 am
Posts: 7729
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
mediavets wrote:
Partial panos - those witha pano FOV of less than 360x180 - are handled diferently from panos with 360x180 panoFOV in PT/PTP.
The settings dialogue panels for each type is different.
For partial panos witha pano FOV of les sthan 360x180 - see screenshot 1.
For 360x180 pano FOV panos - see screenshot 2.

Hi Andrew!

Thanks - i mixed that up.

best, Klaus

_________________
Simplicity is the keynote of all true elegance. Coco Chanel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:24 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 115
Maybe export size was the wrong name. I ment "Partial Panorama Width" is 48.384, but the picture has 183.306 Pixel wide and 75.556 pixel height. So what do I wrong? And who do I know which the best "Cutting Size" is? View angel are 360x150° and spherical.
Thank you

_________________
Visit my page
http://suuperguut.com/ http://suuperguut.at/ http://suuperguut.de/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:00 am
Posts: 199
Location: Francin
[uli]Partial panorama pictures: panorama size is at max input image size (in pixels) for Panotour Pro and limited to 200.000.000 for Panotour[/uli]
[uli]Equirectangular panorama pictures: cube face size is unlimited for Panotour Pro and limited to 5700 for Panotour[/uli]

Cutting size is a clue for calculation algorithm bounding tiles size when creating resolution pyramid.

Better explanations about all these controls will be covered in official documentation.

_________________
--
Yann G.
www.kolor.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:42 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 115
Quote:
• Partial panorama pictures: panorama size is at max input image size (in pixels) for Panotour Pro and limited to 200.000.000 for Panotour

I don't understand why I can not go bigger then 48.384 Pixel in "Partial panorama pictures", because the input image is 183.306 Pixel wide. So PTP downsize the Panorama and I can't do anythink against it. First I though it is a trial limit, but you sad that the limit is 200.000.000. So I don't understand. Is it maybe that I have only 12 GB RAM, 8,5 GB for PTP. The input Image it 8bit, sRGB and Photoshop .psb.

Quote:
Cutting size is a clue for calculation algorithm bounding tiles size when creating resolution pyramid.

This I understand, but why should I chance the "Equirectangular panorama pictures" value. Is there same advantage in having a smaller or biger "bounding tiles size".

Thank you

_________________
Visit my page
http://suuperguut.com/ http://suuperguut.at/ http://suuperguut.de/


Last edited by Sam on Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:58 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13949
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
ygilquin wrote:
[uli]Partial panorama pictures: panorama size is at max input image size (in pixels) for Panotour Pro and limited to 200.000.000 for Panotour[/uli]

The data field is actually named Partial Panorama Width.

Does 'at max input image size (in pixels)' mean unlimited?

Does 200.000.000 mean what I would write as 200,000,000 - in other words two hundred million.

_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Last edited by mediavets on Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:54 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 115
Quote:
• Partial panorama pictures: panorama size is at max input image size (in pixels) for Panotour Pro and limited to 200.000.000 for Panotour

I don't understand why I can not go bigger then 48.384 Pixel in "Partial panorama pictures", because the input image is 183.306 Pixel wide. So PTP downsize the Panorama and I can't do anythink against it. First I though it is a trial limit, but you sad that the limit is 200.000.000. So I don't understand. Is it maybe that I have only 12 GB RAM, 8,5 GB for PTP. The input Image it 8bit, sRGB and Photoshop .psb.

Quote:
Cutting size is a clue for calculation algorithm bounding tiles size when creating resolution pyramid.

This I understand, but why should I chance the "Equirectangular panorama pictures" value. Is there same advantage in having a smaller or biger "bounding tiles size".

Thank you

_________________
Visit my page
http://suuperguut.com/ http://suuperguut.at/ http://suuperguut.de/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:11 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:00 am
Posts: 199
Location: Francin
mediavets wrote:
The data field is actually named Partial Panorama Width.

This shows I work too much with French version of Panotour ;)

mediavets wrote:
Does 'at max input image size (in pixels)' mean unlimited?

It means: you can set any size not exceeding image size. If your input image is for example 2000px wide, you will be able to set any width less than or equal to 2000

mediavets wrote:
Does 200.000.000 mean what I would write as 200,000,000 - in other words two hundred million.

Good assumption.

_________________
--
Yann G.
www.kolor.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:40 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 115
So my problem sees to be a bug. I move it to "Panotour bugs report". See

http://www.autopano.net/forum/t10570-i-can-not-go-bigger-then-48.384-pixel-in-partial-panorama-pictures

_________________
Visit my page
http://suuperguut.com/ http://suuperguut.at/ http://suuperguut.de/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group