360bali wrote::) Hi,
I m new in this forum, find the link of virtual visit a villa at bali :
http://www.360bali.net/visite%20virtuelles/Villa%20modern/visit.html
What you think ?
360bali wrote::) Hi,
I m new in this forum, find the link of virtual visit a villa at bali :
http://www.360bali.net/visite%20virtuelles/Villa%20modern/visit.html
What you think ?
mediavets wrote:I like the way you have planned and photographed the tour, and the way you have designed and used the hotspots, and the way you have mixed stills with the panos in the tour.
mediavets wrote:360bali wrote::) Hi,
I m new in this forum, find the link of virtual visit a villa at bali :
http://www.360bali.net/visite%20virtuelles/Villa%20modern/visit.html
What you think ?
Welcome to the forum.
What camera, lens and pano head did you use?
Did you use some HDR or exposure blending?
I like the way you have planned and photographed the tour, and the way you have designed and used the hotspots, and the way you have mixed stills with the panos in the tour.
360bali wrote::( hi mister klaus,
I m sorry, effectively, i think my pano can't be please at everybody,
this pano is my third and i did many error, but i happen every day,
so thank you for your comment
Regards
360bali wrote:hi, thank you for your compliment,
so i use exposure blending before use autopano, i did many many test and i think is (for me) the better solution
Maybe, you will like this virtual visit (the area swimming-pool/garden) : http://www.360bali.net/visite%20virtuelles/Villa_mertanadiHR/Villa_mertanadiHR.html
Now you have my material below
Regards
klausesser wrote:mediavets wrote:I like the way you have planned and photographed the tour, and the way you have designed and used the hotspots, and the way you have mixed stills with the panos in the tour.
You hit an essential point, Andrew! I think important is a kind of "functional aesthetic" - which means a good functionality presented in an aesthetical way.
We discussed that point over and over here at 360impressions.de - it´s clearly a matter of taste - and we are still debating:
how sophisticated do we HAVE TO be and how sophisticated to be is profitable? And after all: what visual and functional quality can we afford to be identified with and present to a client.
So let me say a few critical words regarding this actual case as an example:
A pano should be handled - in my eyeslike a "classical" photography from some point of view.
Would you EVER accept a "classical" photography of an interior where lots of red dots are placed on walls, windows and doors?
Would you EVER accept an interior photography where looking to the outside is so heavy overexposed?
Sorry, 360bali: i´m not aiming your work in special.
What is panorama-photography all about: just information/lots to see? Here it is definitely superior to "usual" photography.
But ist that enough?
What about style, sensitivity, aesthetics, design, visual consequence - the "classic" photography thing?
............
Just my 2 cents about that whole thing panorama photography . . .
best, Klaus
klausesser wrote:So let me say a few critical words regarding this actual case as an example:
A pano should be handled - in my eyeslike a "classical" photography from some point of view.
Would you EVER accept a "classical" photography of an interior where lots of red dots are placed on walls, windows and doors?
Would you EVER accept an interior photography where looking to the outside is so heavy overexposed?
.............
Just my 2 cents about that whole thing panorama photography . . .
best, Klaus
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests