Ken Austins Car Collection  

Share what you've done with Panotour or Panotour Pro.
Montrez nous vos oeuvres avec Panotour ou Panotour Pro.
User avatar
billjones
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 101
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:38 pm
Location: Newberg Oregon
Info

Ken Austins Car Collection

by billjones » Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:19 am

http://astimegoesby.us/panoramas/austinscarcollection

First 4 scenes have been replaced with hd scenes, scene 4 and 1927 T Street Rod has an audio link. The biggest part of this tour is the drop down combobox on the left, links to image gallerys of cars, Ken Austins story and interior panoramas, there are 6 interior scenes and the sides which are the nadir points need to be cleaned up. Just have to go back and shoot them.

Mr. Austin will be recording audio stories about each car in the Picture Gallery.

This is a work in progress.

Feedback is appreciated.
Last edited by billjones on Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
billjones
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 101
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:38 pm
Location: Newberg Oregon
Info

by billjones » Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:58 am

I thought they should be sharper as well. The camera and lense where on a mount and with an 8mm there was a bracket around the lens and I think I must have gotten it out of focus. I was at f7.1 so I agrre it should have been sharper. Fortunatly I have access so retakes are not an issue.

Now that you brought it up, with the current rig, I don't have to use the clamp as the rail can be shifted backwards. Thanks.

no avatar
MART
Member
 
Posts: 23
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:52 pm
Info

by MART » Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:54 am

Hi
You might want to check stitching as it is also an issue in the panos I looked at.

User avatar
billjones
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 101
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:38 pm
Location: Newberg Oregon
Info

by billjones » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:13 pm

I think my biggest change have been my eyes. I went from a Mk I to MK II but use the same 8mm Sigma for the fisheye shots. The Jag was taken on a mini pod as was the 62Corvette so the nadir are top and bottom. The church was taken with both a 17x40 set at 17 for the main shot and 3 shot groups with the 8mm. I re shot the first 4 of the panos with a 35mm fixed focal so that increased my image count from 36 to 88, sometimes a blessing, sometimes not. It seems to make the most difference in overall activity. a white room with out furniture seems to do better with less shots.

The car interiors are a work in progress, they where taken with a boom and I know why they suck. Boom sagged, zenith off and no way to get a reasonable set of nadirs which would be the side windows. Manfrotto makes good stuff, just not for this stuff. I dug out my old C stand (steel heavy gauge) and a steel tube 3 foot boom and having a machinist thread one end of a 4 foot 7/16 steel rod (not tube) and weld a flat plate on the other end, this will allow me to mount either the 8mm with a collar ring on the end or the camera body on a rail on the other end. and the 7/16 rod just barely fits in the tube so the will be no perceptible sag. I will use a level on the end to get parallel to the floor and then drill a hole in the clamp for a lock pin. The camera will be rotated bu rotating the rod in the tube.

All the floor panos where re shot yesterday with the same 8mm but 4 shot instead of 5 shot and the focus set, With the collar on the the lens you can't see the focus ring marks, The collar ring clamp has small gap that I use to all ow the auto/manual focus switch to sit between. At this point I used a pencil to mark the barrel for best focus (determined without the collar on).

Image

The new pano's are stitched and has gone through the first bad stitch edits. They will be be out there in about an hour. The interiors have been semi edited, but I haven't the new rig built yet so just so you know, I know their bad. I also need to work on what lens to take the nadirs with when using the 8mm.

User avatar
gkaefer
Member
 
Posts: 3549
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 15 posts
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:01 pm
Location: Salzburg
Info

by gkaefer » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:22 pm

... about lens & nadir... in autopano you cant mix fisheye and non fisheye images....
Georg

User avatar
billjones
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 101
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:38 pm
Location: Newberg Oregon
Info

by billjones » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:46 pm

I have a gigapan pro for the stuff they recommend it be used for, also a nodal ninja 5, for small 8mm pano's I would just use a light stand with the collar clamp attached to the stand, then a high tech piece of blue tape with 4 pen marks. I am putting the gigapan to more use now. It was used for the 35mm shots and this last batch of 8mm shots. With it's current rail it still sticks out a little further the optimum but is exact. Just set the gigapan for a 75deg FOV for 5 shots or 90deg for 4 shots, use the shutter on a time and walk away. Point is Gigapan say's not to use a fisheye because their software doesn't work well with it. When will company's learn that our loyalty is to whoever does the job TODAY. Two of the 35mm / 88 shot groups just would not stitch with auropano so I used Ice, which I don't like because of lack of control, yet autopano did everything else. I keep waffling back and forth between panotour pro and krpano tools, I know panotour pro is built on top of krpano and have just come to believe that you use both and massage a lot.

User avatar
billjones
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 101
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:38 pm
Location: Newberg Oregon
Info

by billjones » Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:35 pm

all the new panos have been uploaded, I'm sure there is something ugly I missed, eyes are going cross eyed so let me know. As big as this is, it's being done as a concept for small museums and art galleries.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron