Image-stitching and virtual tour solutions My account Updates
It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:45 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13962
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
I seem to have managed (not intentionally) to create thumbnails that are larger than the background thumbnail bar.

Is this to be expected or a bug?





_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Last edited by mediavets on Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:13 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:18 am
Posts: 264
This is a side effect of the known bug announced in the beta 7 changelog.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:18 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13962
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Adrien F wrote:
This is a side effect of the known bug announced in the beta 7 changelog.

OK - this is what you refer to?:
known bug:
* Thumbnail : if you stretch the window along width, size of thumbnail pictures will grow but not the height of the thumbnail plugin. This may cause overlapping of thumbnail pictures in some cases.

_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:01 pm
Posts: 3323
Location: Salzburg
Christian Walz in Tarantinos inglorious bastards said: "biiiiiiinngggooooo". ;-)
I support your "its a bug theory"

I took a nearly square image and added it twice to the pano in my test.
for left pano I said spherical projection
for right pano I saig planar projection.
in fact its any emxample image I took - a screenshot - so def. planar...

as you can see in my screenshots:
the left thumb is not square in format and result in preview is not planar, but the thumb overlap is normal
the right thumb is suare in format and result in preview is planar, but thumb overlap is incorrect as in your example...

Liebe Gruesse,
Georg





_________________
pages: gigapixel.at - jedermann.at - My Equipment


Last edited by gkaefer on Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:20 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13962
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Adrien,

A related question.

What determines the aspect ratio and FOV of thumbnail images?

_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:10 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13962
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Following on from my previous post...and the post from Georg...

Experimentation shows that if a tour comprises panos with different aspect ratios - for example some spherical panos plus a number of partial panos each with a different pano FOV then the thumbnails will be of different sizes and aspect ratios - whicb is plainly unacceptable for a thumbnail bar for navigation.

What plans are there to resolve this and how do you plan to resolve it?

_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Last edited by mediavets on Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:56 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:18 am
Posts: 264
mediavets wrote:
What determines the aspect ratio and FOV of thumbnail images?

Thumbnail images are the same as preview images used in krpano. So for a spherical pano, FOV (vertical and horizontal) will be used to determine aspect ratio, in the case of a planar projection, the picture keep its original aspect ratio.

This is the good way if we don't want stretching of the pictures.

mediavets wrote:
for example some spherical panos plus a number of partial panos each with a different pano FOV then the thumbnails will be of different sizes and aspect ratios - which is plainly unacceptable for a thumbnail bar for navigation. What plans are there to resolve this and how do you plan to resolve it?

This is normal behavior. How do you want to represent thumbnails of panos with different aspect ratio, with the same size and aspect ratio, without stretching the images? Of course we could stretch all thumbnails to the same normalized size, but that would be, IMO, visually unacceptable.

There is two ways to overcome the actual thumbnail size problem:

* The first one is to resize each thumbnail so it fit into an invisible container, each container having the same aspect ratio:
=>No more overlapping between thumbs
=>Aspect ratio of thumbs is kept
=>this is more or less the thumbnail preview in windows (and other OS) explorer.

* The second one is to crop some part of the panoramas preview so it fit some predefined dimension and aspect ratio
=>All thumbs have same aspect ratio and same size (hence an homogeneous view in thumbnail slide)
=>No difference between full 360 and partial pano
=>No visual indices on the panorama aspect ratio : not satisfying for users doing vertical panorama (and eventually mix them with classical panos in a visit)
=>Which part of the pano should we crop? (not really an issue but I put it)

You see I long for the first one, but I agree the second one has its pros.

So here you go to tell which one could satisfy to the more general cases. And let's focus on the one which should be implemented first. We know all solution should be proposed, but this is middle/long term.

Of course you can propose other way (for the actual thumbnail model, no caroussel or other sliding thumbnail like the krpano plugin).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:59 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13962
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Adrien F wrote:
There is two ways to overcome the actual thumbnail size problem:

* The first one is to resize each thumbnail so it fit into an invisible container, each container having the same aspect ratio:
=>No more overlapping between thumbs
=>Aspect ratio of thumbs is kept
=>this is more or less the thumbnail preview in windows (and other OS) explorer.

* The second one is to crop some part of the panoramas preview so it fit some predefined dimension and aspect ratio
=>All thumbs have same aspect ratio and same size (hence an homogeneous view in thumbnail slide)
=>No difference between full 360 and partial pano
=>No visual indices on the panorama aspect ratio : not satisfying for users doing vertical panorama (and eventually mix them with classical panos in a visit)
=>Which part of the pano should we crop? (not really an issue but I put it)

You see I long for the first one, but I agree the second one has its pros.

So here you go to tell which one could satisfy to the more general cases. And let's focus on the one which should be implemented first. We know all solution should be proposed, but this is middle/long term.

Of course you can propose other way (for the actual thumbnail model, no caroussel or other sliding thumbnail like the krpano plugin).

I am finding it hard to visualise - and thus choose - between the two options you describe.

Here are some APT preview images; can you show me what they would look like when turned into thumbnails - for the same thumbnail bar - in each of the two proposed 'styles'?











_________________
Andrew Stephens
Many different Nodal Ninja and Agnos pano heads. Merlin/Panogear mount with Papywizard on Nokia Internet tablets.
Nikon D5100 and D40, Sigma 8mm f3.5 FE, Nikon 10.5mm FE, 35mm, 50mm, 18-55mm, 70-210mm. Promote control.


Last edited by mediavets on Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:11 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:18 am
Posts: 264
Here are two screenshot of the possible solutions I proposed.
On the first one proportion are kept. On the second one, previews are croped.






Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group