360 VR stiching issues  

Share your tips and tricks here or get help with any Autopano Pro / Giga problem!
No bug reports (of any kind) in this forum!
no avatar
CCompton
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 44
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 4:18 pm
Info

360 VR stiching issues

by CCompton » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:09 pm

I am stitching 360x180 vr tours , and Im having trouble getting the software to align the images at first build. Im using a 10.5 fisheye, and a well calibrated bogen manfrotto head that has worked perfectly in the past with previous versions of this software. However now it never seems to recognize the correct order and I have to manually stich the images every time.....suggestions?

no avatar
digipano
Member
 
Posts: 582
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:07 am
Info

by digipano » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:42 am

Check the exif values are correct & recognized by APP, if for any reason the exif is not correct you can manually enter the values, that should be the 1st step in getting things right.

no avatar
hankkarl
Member
 
Posts: 1284
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA
Info

by hankkarl » Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:00 pm

Also, make sure the lens is being detected as a fisheye.

no avatar
CCompton
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 44
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 4:18 pm
Info

by CCompton » Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:25 pm

The reality is Ive found the 1.4 is working better for me. Although it still has problems recognizing the pano (even there it depends on the image, sometimes it gets it in one shot sometimes I have to sit and maualy set the control points). 2.0.2 is just way to unstable in either 32 of 64 bit. I also find that if I set 10.5 I get better RMS values than when I let it rcognize the exif data for the lens.....

no avatar
digipano
Member
 
Posts: 582
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:07 am
Info

by digipano » Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:59 pm

v2.0 is quite different from 1.4.2, many things have been implemented different thus it gives that impression. v2 is surely faster than 1.4.2

no avatar
CCompton
Member
 
Topic author
Posts: 44
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 4:18 pm
Info

by CCompton » Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:36 pm

I agree, but it crashes more often

no avatar
OfF3nSiV3
Member
 
Posts: 20
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:41 pm
Info

by OfF3nSiV3 » Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:29 pm

yeah, 2.02 has been crashing like crazy

no avatar
digipano
Member
 
Posts: 582
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:07 am
Info

by digipano » Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:04 am

Yes you are right 2.02, many have reported that crash.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests