Image-stitching and virtual tour solutions My account Updates
It is currently Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:13 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2014 3:27 pm 
Offline
New member

Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:40 pm
Posts: 3
Hello,
I've worked with spherical panoramas since today with only little problems.
Now I've tried to stitch a simple 3 photo vertical sequence but all my attempts produced very poor results.
I can't understand which projection is the best choice for such a "simple" task.
I guessed the planar projection was the best, and as a matter of fact it looks so, but it cause a large progressive stretch in the upper and lower section of the panorama (you can play a bit with the pitch angle setting to "center" the panorama, but stretch persists).
All others projections give unappceptable distortions in the upper and lower section of the resulting panorama.
Obviously some projections (spherical, cylindrical, little planet, mirror ball) are surely unfit for this goal, but, as I wrote, all the others seem not better in my newbie experience.
Paradoxically I get much better results with a "generic" (even though top level) software like Photoshop.
Which is your experience about this matter?
Thank you in advance for your attention.

Andrea


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2014 5:14 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13971
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
alfapapa wrote:
Hello,
I've worked with spherical panoramas since today with only little problems.
Now I've tried to stitch a simple 3 photo vertical sequence but all my attempts produced very poor results.
I can't understand which projection is the best choice for such a "simple" task.
I guessed the planar projection was the best, and as a matter of fact it looks so, but it cause a large progressive stretch in the upper and lower section of the panorama (you can play a bit with the pitch angle setting to "center" the panorama, but stretch persists).
All others projections give unacceptable distortions in the upper and lower section of the resulting panorama.
Obviously some projections (spherical, cylindrical, little planet, mirror ball) are surely unfit for this goal, but, as I wrote, all the others seem not better in my newbie experience.
Paradoxically I get much better results with a "generic" (even though top level) software like Photoshop.
Which is your experience about this matter?
Thank you in advance for your attention.

Andrea

Welcome to the forum...

If these three standard photo images were not shot using pano head then you will probably get a better result from something like Photoshop.

If you would like to make the image set available as ZIP file for download then I expect there will be people here who would be happy to take a look and do a trial stitch so as to be able to offer better advice.

Meanwhile here are links to some information about projection types:
http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/action/ ... ting_Modes

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutori ... ctions.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 9:07 am 
Offline
New member

Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:40 pm
Posts: 3
Thank you Mediavets,

I'm going to read the pages you linked about projections...
As you suggest I attach a zip file encluding the images set and a low-res rendering of my best effort with planar projection (pitch angle = 15).
The images aren't particulary nice, it's only for testing this kind of stitching (I guess I'll need to tune it soon).
As you foresee, the photos were not shot using a panohead. I believed it's not the main problem as the control points and stitching areas look fine. The main issue is the progressive stretching of the upper and lower images (i.e. it leaps out that people in the lower-left part is dramatically distorted compared to the "original" image).
May be it's an unavoidable peculiarity of projections =(


Attachments:
test_images.ZIP [10.69 MiB]
Downloaded 10 times
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13971
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
IMO the issue is entirely related to the pano field of view.

If you view the stitched image as part of a Panotour virtual tour the distortion is 'corrected'.

Where you hoping to print the stitched pano image?


Attachments:
2-pt21-zoom-oxford-partial.jpg
2-pt21-zoom-oxford-partial.jpg [ 224.04 KiB | Viewed 215 times ]
1-ptp21-oxford-partial-spherical.jpg
1-ptp21-oxford-partial-spherical.jpg [ 187.86 KiB | Viewed 215 times ]
[Group 1]-_01__03-3 images-oxford-partial-03.jpg
[Group 1]-_01__03-3 images-oxford-partial-03.jpg [ 529.32 KiB | Viewed 215 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 10:11 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13971
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
If you want to print the pano you may like to 'play' with the Pannini projection:


Attachments:
1-apg-panini.jpg
1-apg-panini.jpg [ 228.01 KiB | Viewed 211 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 10:33 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13971
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
More about projections:

http://hugin.sourceforge.net/docs/manua ... tions.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 3:16 pm 
Offline
New member

Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 2:40 pm
Posts: 3
Tank you for your posts,

My goal was to generate a pano similar as a single photo I could shot if could walk back till entire subject was included in a single shot (exclusive of the image resolution of course) possibly printed on paper and not to be used as a virtual tour.
It looks a very complex matter indeed!
As I read in one of your links "If you are looking for a single projection, that will map a spherical (even partial) panorama on a flat surface without bending lines: This won't work!".
I tried with Panini projection parameters too, but I can't minimize the "bubble" distortions at the pano extremity (as in your sample jpg).
I'll try to take some shots extending the photo coverage up and down in order to use only the best part of the images (center section=less parallax?) and cut away the stretched extremities...Hmmm... no, the crucial point should be the (wide) FOV.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2014 4:54 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 13971
Location: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
alfapapa wrote:
Tank you for your posts,

My goal was to generate a pano similar as a single photo I could shot if could walk back till entire subject was included in a single shot (exclusive of the image resolution of course) possibly printed on paper and not to be used as a virtual tour.
It looks a very complex matter indeed!
As I read in one of your links "If you are looking for a single projection, that will map a spherical (even partial) panorama on a flat surface without bending lines: This won't work!".
I tried with Panini projection parameters too, but I can't minimize the "bubble" distortions at the pano extremity (as in your sample jpg).
I'll try to take some shots extending the photo coverage up and down in order to use only the best part of the images (center section=less parallax?) and cut away the stretched extremities...Hmmm... no, the crucial point should be the (wide) FOV.


Yes, you'll need to shoot a larger view and then crop into it.

The alternative would be to use tilt-shift lens I believe?:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective_control_lens

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilt%E2%80 ... hotography


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group