gogles314 wrote:
3. Hard linking is off both global and local (not sure if there independent). Why do you think this would help?.
gogles314 wrote:Off to try Papywizard...
mediavets wrote:gogles314 wrote:Off to try Papywizard...
The main Papywizard site seems to be down at the moment but you can download Papywizard from here instead:
http://www.papymerlin.com/t%C3%A9lechar ... d/windows/
gogles314 wrote:Thanks for the link. That works - it took some fiddling, but APG produces a much nicer result when I feed it the .xml from Papywizard.
I'm still wondering if there's a bug in the gigapan import (i.e., why's APG ignoring the 40% overlap instruction when it can't find links during the import) but at least this gives a workable path forward.
gogles314 wrote:I'm still wondering if there's a bug in the gigapan import (i.e., why's APG ignoring the 40% overlap instruction when it can't find links during the import) but at least this gives a workable path forward.
mediavets wrote:gogles314 wrote:Thanks for the link. That works - it took some fiddling, but APG produces a much nicer result when I feed it the .xml from Papywizard.
You are obviously a fast learner - I was expecting questions.![]()
I'd be interested in seeing a comparable screenshot showing the Papywizard import result.I'm still wondering if there's a bug in the gigapan import (i.e., why's APG ignoring the 40% overlap instruction when it can't find links during the import) but at least this gives a workable path forward.
Quite possibly - if the Gigapan Stitcher worked then that ceratinly suggests there might be - you could ask Kolor whether they'd like to invesitigate with your image set.
Nobody has ever explained quite what processes the various Import wizards use.
mediavets wrote:gogles314 wrote:I'm still wondering if there's a bug in the gigapan import (i.e., why's APG ignoring the 40% overlap instruction when it can't find links during the import) but at least this gives a workable path forward.
Does the general information data look correct to you?
It states 180 images in 60 stacks, so I presume you have three expsoures in each bracketed series, but there appear to be many more than 60 stacks (ie. more than 60 shooting positions).
gogles314 wrote:I see your question now... it did split up some of the stacks originally (i.e., without the xml input). I'm not sure why it does that, since it clearly knows they're bracketed. I could hard link them and see if that helps, but I think the xml is doing that anyways.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests