Image-stitching and virtual tour solutions My account Updates
It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:44 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:46 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:16 am
Posts: 177
Hello,

I noticed some quality differences using TIFF-16 and CR2 images in the resultant panorama... The image attached shows two results; the first (left) image was generated converting the CR2 to TIFF16 in CS3 to generate the panorama; the second image (right) was generated using the CR2 files directly in APP2.0, Each image was rendered as 16bit PSD.

To me the difference is obvious; however, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong...

No filter adjustment was applied during the CR2-->TIFF-16 conversion, or, in APP2.0 like LDR/HDR...

Any ideas / comments / suggestions?

Ronald




Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:54 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:30 pm
Posts: 1856
Location: Sweden
That's the whole point of using dedicated RAW conversion software. Nothing wrong here. Striaght off the top of the hat, I can see that CS3 used a different demosaicing algorithm to the one dcraw used and applied some unsharp masking. Most RAW conversion software lie when they claim to make no adjustments. RawTherapee is one of the exceptions.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group