[APP 2.0 WinXP 32] TIFF16 vs CR2 - Expected results???  

This forum is dedicated to Autopano Pro / Giga bug reports and features discussion.
Please read the posting rules before starting a topic!
no avatar
Ronald
Member
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:16 am

[APP 2.0 WinXP 32] TIFF16 vs CR2 - Expected results???

by Ronald » Sat May 16, 2009 12:46 am

Hello,

I noticed some quality differences using TIFF-16 and CR2 images in the resultant panorama... The image attached shows two results; the first (left) image was generated converting the CR2 to TIFF16 in CS3 to generate the panorama; the second image (right) was generated using the CR2 files directly in APP2.0, Each image was rendered as 16bit PSD.

To me the difference is obvious; however, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong...

No filter adjustment was applied during the CR2-->TIFF-16 conversion, or, in APP2.0 like LDR/HDR...

Any ideas / comments / suggestions?

Ronald



User avatar
DrSlony
Moderator
 
Posts: 1877
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: Sweden

by DrSlony » Sat May 16, 2009 12:54 am

That's the whole point of using dedicated RAW conversion software. Nothing wrong here. Striaght off the top of the hat, I can see that CS3 used a different demosaicing algorithm to the one dcraw used and applied some unsharp masking. Most RAW conversion software lie when they claim to make no adjustments. RawTherapee is one of the exceptions.


Return to Autopano bug & discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests