Which tripod head?  

In the panorama field, hardware is also part of the success. You can discuss here about it: camera, computer, pano head, anything
User avatar
DrSlony
Moderator
 
Topic author
Posts: 1893
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: Sweden
Info

Which tripod head?

by DrSlony » Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:40 pm

Hey!

I'm getting a Manfrotto 055CXPRO4 this week and I need a head to go along with it. I chose that tripod because its very sturdy for a tripod you can take with you when you go on a long trip, and it should fit into handheld baggage hold in airplanes. I'm currently using a Panosaurus, but I'm likely to upgrade to something better (faster mounting time is most important to me) soon. I need a head for the tripod. I will either attach the panoramic head to the tripod head, or straight to the tripod if possible. I currently use a sort-of ball head (it's a pan head but controlled using one lever, which makes it like a ball head, see the Velbon Sherpa 200r) and like it very much. Naturally the new tripod + head will be used both for plain photography and for attaching the panohead to it (if the panohead cannot be attached straight to the tripod, of course).

My camera is a Pentax K10D, so that's 793g + lens. I will be upgrading to the successor of the Nikon D700 (1074g + lens) (or something similar - I read rumors I would have to wait till 2012 for a successor).

Which tripod head type and which specific make & model would you recommend?

User avatar
John_Sauter
Member
 
Posts: 173
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Info

by John_Sauter » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:06 pm

DrSlony wrote:Which tripod head type and which specific make & model would you recommend?

I have an older model of the Manfrotto 055 legs, and I use the 303 panoramic head. Checking the Manfrotto web site, they appear to have two current models of the 303. The deluxe one looks quite interesting, see <http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/site/manfrotto/pid/2357>.

I have had no trouble using the older Manfrotto 303 with my small camera, and it is rugged enough that I expect it would work for your DSLR. The newer offering should be able to handle up to medium-format cameras.

no avatar
hankkarl
Member
 
Posts: 1284
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA
Info

by hankkarl » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:33 pm

I have the Manfroto 303sph. Its big, heavy, and adds roll because the rails are not sturdy enough. Also, you can't take a nadir shot with the camera on the tripod (or more precisely, with all three of the tripod legs properly placed on the floor.)

Also, I don't know how Poland is, but you can't take a tripod in carry on luggage in the US. I guess they figure it looks too much like a club.

User avatar
DrSlony
Moderator
 
Topic author
Posts: 1893
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: Sweden
Info

by DrSlony » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:33 pm

John: thank you, but I'm not looking for a panoramic head, but a normal one!
hankkarl: I've been living in London since November 2009 :]

Manfrotto's website doesn't offer any real information on their ball heads. They're all "perfect for advanced amateurs and professional". Judging from their site, the 498RC4 seems better than the 498RC2 despite being a newer model - it's smaller and lighter, so why make a newer model that's worse than its predecessor? Clearly there is information missing.

User avatar
John_Sauter
Member
 
Posts: 173
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:59 pm
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Info

by John_Sauter » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:14 pm

DrSlony wrote:John: thank you, but I'm not looking for a panoramic head, but a normal one!

Sorry, I misunderstood.

The credible place to look for useful information comparing tripod heads is photography sites that do comparison testing. Unfortunately, I know of none.

When I got my Manfrotto tripod, I originally got an 804RC2 for it: <http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/site/manfrotto/pid/4432>. i removed it to mount my 303, so I haven't used it recently, but it seemed like quite a serviceable head.

no avatar
hankkarl
Member
 
Posts: 1284
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Connecticut, USA
Info

by hankkarl » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:37 pm

Pano heads are subjective, there are a lot of different versions of a ball head, all the same quality, but one has the grip horizontal, anther has it vertical, another has no handle, then there's the choice of quick release plates. Three way heads have similar issues. You have to go to a store and see how they feel to you.

BTW, check out the architectural 3way head if you do a lot of landscapes.
Last edited by hankkarl on Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
leedsjoe
Member
 
Posts: 187
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 1 post
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:33 pm
Location: West Drayton, UK
Info

by leedsjoe » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:49 pm

If it is any help http://www.morrisphoto.co.uk/ is where I bought my tripod & monopod. A very comprehensive site, in the UK.

User avatar
klausesser
Member
 
Posts: 8836
Likes: 5 posts
Liked in: 64 posts
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 12:18 am
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Info

by klausesser » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:52 pm

DrSlony wrote:Which tripod head type and which specific make & model would you recommend?

This one: http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/cache/offonce/pid/2343

i use it for years with 35mm/DSLR, midformat Hasselblad analoge and digital and often with a
4x5" Linhof Technika LF camera.
It´s very precise, reliable and strong.

Not cheap but worth every dime!

best, Klaus

here with a Wista 4x5":
Image
Last edited by klausesser on Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simplicity is the keynote of all true elegance. Coco Chanel

User avatar
DrSlony
Moderator
 
Topic author
Posts: 1893
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:30 pm
Location: Sweden
Info

by DrSlony » Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:41 pm

I found this brief info about some Manfrotto ball heads:
http://www.photographyblog.com/news/new_ball_heads_from_manfrotto/

no avatar
tived
Member
 
Posts: 796
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:49 pm
Location: Dane in Western Australia
Info

by tived » Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:19 am

Hi Doctor,

if it isn't too late I will ad my $.02 I am not a big fan of the Manfrotto Ball heads, but its been a few years since I have owned one 468rc I think it couldn't hold big loads.

I use an Arca Swiss B1 at the moment, but if I were to do it again, I would buy a www.ReallyrightStuff.com their large ball head, 55-BH I think its called with a Panning plate, obviously this is all Arca-swiss dove tail fittings, but on the RRS, you should be able to add your own top plate. any that would be where i'd spend my money.

The Manfrotto compare to the Arca Swiss B1, is miles apart, the B1 you can have a heavy rig hanging off to the side and it doesn't slip. The Manfrotto would, aim at the moon with a long lens, and when you let go of the knob, it would drop.

I also use a Manfrotto 410 pan and tilt head, a bit more upmarket version of the one Klaus is showing.

Good luck,

If you buy the RRS and don't like it, let me know and I will buy it off you.

Henrik


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest