You are not logged in.

> The forum rules have been updated. Please take a moment to read them.


#1 2010-04-01 15:28:01

TriniArt
Member
Registered: 2010-02-27
Posts: 12

Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

Just received the new crown from Teleskop Austria.
However the center hole is round and does not have the indent like
the new crown diagram or the existing crown that comes with the head.
This would prevent it from being tightened properly on the bolt.
Is this Correct? Or should I return it?

I notice that it does have a threaded hole through the side (see below photo).
Can I use a bolt to secure it to the Head bolt instead of sending it back ?

Any help from those who have installed this new crown would be appreciated.

Also do I need a friction pad? and what type of material should I use. ( I don't want to
use the one from the supplied original head, as I may use this when I change cameras(Canon 550D)
later  this year.


Uploaded Images

Offline

 

#2 2010-04-01 15:54:12

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 6181
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

It is very difficult to drill a non-circular hole wink So, the alternative is to put a screw on the side, like on this crown.

And yes, you'd better use the friction. You may search for an alternate one; let us know if you find something usefull.


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#3 2010-04-01 16:30:45

Photosbykev
Member
From: Gloucester, UK
Registered: 2010-02-15
Posts: 123
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

By leaving off the D-hole machining they have reduced the manufacturing cost. The grubscrew in the side is a reasonable alternative but could easily be the cause of backlash problems as the grub screw will tend to slide on the the flat of the drive shaft. I ended up using a thin sheet of rubber gasket material which has been successful so far but I did machine the d-shape into my crown when I made it so the rubber has less to do.

Offline

 

#4 2010-04-01 16:40:38

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 6181
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

The movement is done via the friction, so there can't be backlash here, even without the D-hole.

The D-hole (or similar stuff, like the side hole) is only helpfull to tighten the nuts of the crown; on one side, the nut press the ball bearing, on the other side, the nut press the friction crown. This way, you can hold the crown, and turn both nuts independently. Without the D-hole, it is very difficult to hold the shaft, to make a precise setup for both actions...


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#5 2010-04-01 16:49:58

Paul
Member
From: Bonn, Germany
Registered: 2008-08-30
Posts: 846

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

for the friction pad you may get a used inner tyre tube at your local gas station or tyre service

cut off a piece and glue it with double sided ahesive tape on the crowns surface

I made my crown out of a piece of pom, napped it with abrasive paper, so it works without a friction pad

http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/images-en/4/43/Merlin_Black.jpg


Paul

close, but no cigar ... ... ...

Offline

 

#6 2010-05-09 22:04:03

mark_anderson_us
Member
From: Chicago
Registered: 2008-11-30
Posts: 202
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

could someone send me a link to this crown? (couldn;t find on their site)

Does it have correct npp alignment for canon (30D)

Does it include rails?

thanks

Mark


Canon EOS 30D with BG-E2 grip
50mm f1.4, 16-35mm f2.8L, 28-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L, 100mm f2.8 Macro
Gitzo 2531, Merlin/Orion

Offline

 

#7 2010-05-10 01:22:42

krtekcz2000
Member
From: Birmingham, UK
Registered: 2010-05-03
Posts: 30
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

http://www.teleskop-austria.at/prod.php … -mottri-nn

I have just ordered one, I don't think that rails are included. My plan is to fit the Manfrotto 357 plate:
http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/site/man … mp;idx=115

Offline

 

#8 2010-05-10 14:34:39

mark_anderson_us
Member
From: Chicago
Registered: 2008-11-30
Posts: 202
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

krtekcz2000 wrote:

http://www.teleskop-austria.at/prod.php?lng=de&tid=8#foto-mottri-nn

I have just ordered one, I don't think that rails are included. My plan is to fit the Manfrotto 357 plate:
http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/site/man … mp;idx=115

Thanks krtekcz2000, have you figured out you're NPP alignment (getting LR center directly above center of crown) with the Manfrotto plate?

I'm still trying to figure out how this crown adapter will fit and how to do the NPP alignment. Everything in the site is in German.

How did you arrange payment? I contact them some months ago about the BT interface, but never really got a satisfactory answer on payment, shipping costs, etc. What did you do to order from UK?

I've got soem colleagues over there next week, so could potentially ship for one of them to bring back, but need a guarantee of arrival in the next 7-10 days

Cheers

Mark


Canon EOS 30D with BG-E2 grip
50mm f1.4, 16-35mm f2.8L, 28-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L, 100mm f2.8 Macro
Gitzo 2531, Merlin/Orion

Offline

 

#9 2010-05-10 18:26:36

krtekcz2000
Member
From: Birmingham, UK
Registered: 2010-05-03
Posts: 30
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

have you figured out you're NPP alignment (getting LR center directly above center of crown) with the Manfrotto plate?

Not yet, but I assume (based on the scheme, that the camera will be too close to the crown (it is currently too far from the crown). So I need to add some additional plate (or sealing) between the Manfrotto 357 plate. It should be easier to move the camera from the crown than to the crown. The extra sealing will be probably wooden and the thickness will depend on a specific camera.

The crown scheme is here:
http://www.autopano.net/wiki-fr/images- … _crown.png


I'm still trying to figure out how this crown adapter will fit and how to do the NPP alignment. Everything in the site is in German.

I speek a little bit German, but I rather use http://translate.google.com

How did you arrange payment? I contact them some months ago about the BT interface, but never really got a satisfactory answer on payment, shipping costs, etc. What did you do to order from UK?

I have added the crown to the basket and then I proceeded to the check out. I didn't provide any credit card details, so I don't know exactly the payment details (maybe I will pay when it is delivered).

The status of the order is now: "Muss nachbestellt werden" translated in google as "Must be ordered". I understand that it means that no crowns are currently in the stock.

I have send them an email today asking about delivery time and payment details, no answer yet.

I forgot to mention that their website sais that they deliver to EU (10 Euros postage).

Offline

 

#10 2010-05-10 18:36:52

mark_anderson_us
Member
From: Chicago
Registered: 2008-11-30
Posts: 202
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

The status of the order is now: "Muss nachbestellt werden" translated in google as "Must be ordered". I understand that it means that no crowns are currently in the stock.

I have send them an email today asking about delivery time and payment details, no answer yet.

I forgot to mention that their website sais that they deliver to EU (10 Euros postage).

Would you mind keeping me posted on lead times once you get an answer?

Thanks

Mark


Canon EOS 30D with BG-E2 grip
50mm f1.4, 16-35mm f2.8L, 28-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L, 100mm f2.8 Macro
Gitzo 2531, Merlin/Orion

Offline

 

#11 2010-05-10 18:38:55

krtekcz2000
Member
From: Birmingham, UK
Registered: 2010-05-03
Posts: 30
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

Would you mind keeping me posted on lead times once you get an answer?

No problem.

Offline

 

#12 2010-05-11 00:23:42

krtekcz2000
Member
From: Birmingham, UK
Registered: 2010-05-03
Posts: 30
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

So here is the answer:

Thank you for your question!

We receive 10 pcs Crown Adapters in 7-10 days.

If the Crown Adapter on stock (or 2-3 days before), we send you a ProForma
Invoice.
You can the amount wire (f.e. Netbanking) or send us via PayPal (3,9% fee).

Unfortunately we can not aacept Credit cards.

Best regards:

Lajos Szantho

Offline

 

#13 2010-05-11 09:11:08

bradtem
Member
Registered: 2008-11-18
Posts: 224

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

So the goal of the crown is just to be a spacer and put the camera a bit further away to center the nodal point above the point of rotation?    My personal plan will be to put an arca swiss clamp onto my dovetail rail, which will move the camera in about 10mm, combined with the plate that is already on the bottom of all my cameras.   Other spacers and a longer 1/4-20 screw could be used to adjust this, though of course the longer your moment arm the more wobble.  Is the main purpose of a heavy crown like this to reduce the wobble?

Offline

 

#14 2010-05-11 09:45:37

claudevh
Moderator
From: Mont-Saint-André (Belgium)
Registered: 2007-11-25
Posts: 1389
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

For your info,

2 schema's of the modified crown exits in the Wiki ... one who is let say "UNIVERSAL" (the first one) and the second one who is adapted for the usage the "popular" Manfrotto 357 rail system (the second one).
Pay attention that for the second one the measurements should be confirmed !

http://www.autopano.net/wiki-fr/action/ … a_couronne


cool Claude cool
Merlin + Papywizard on Windows 7 & Nokia 770 § N810 & Acer (Netbook) + PanoramaApp Androïd + Deltawave PapyMerlin BT + Autopano
Spherical Pano (180 x 360) with Canon 40D + Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 Zoom & Pôle Pano with Canon 5D MK2 and shaved Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Gigapixel photography with Nikon D200 + Sigma 70-200 F 2.8 EX DG APO HSM

Offline

 

#15 2010-05-11 10:52:50

mediavets
Moderator
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 9742
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

claudevh wrote:

the second one who is adapted for the usage the "popular" Manfrotto 357 rail system (the second one).
Pay attention that for the second one the measurements should be confirmed !

http://www.autopano.net/wiki-fr/action/ … a_couronne

How much additional adustment 'space' do you get after replacing the crown and adding a Manfrotto 357 rail?

Just looking at photos of such setups it appears to me that much of the extra 'gain' achieved by replacing the crown is then lost again when using a Manfrotto 357 rail.


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Nodal Ninja 4 with R-D16, Agno's MrotatorTCS short.
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket, Agno's MrotatorA.
Merlin/Orion robotic pano head + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800/N810 and Windows 8/XP/2K.

Offline

 

#16 2010-05-11 17:25:55

claudevh
Moderator
From: Mont-Saint-André (Belgium)
Registered: 2007-11-25
Posts: 1389
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

Andrew,

You are probably right but I can't say exactly, I don't have one ! wink

Nevertheless the modified crown with a Manfrotto rail is a very flexible solution ... and allow the placement with big diameters lenses more then increasing the vertical space adjustment ! smile

"fma38" have this setting !


cool Claude cool
Merlin + Papywizard on Windows 7 & Nokia 770 § N810 & Acer (Netbook) + PanoramaApp Androïd + Deltawave PapyMerlin BT + Autopano
Spherical Pano (180 x 360) with Canon 40D + Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 Zoom & Pôle Pano with Canon 5D MK2 and shaved Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Gigapixel photography with Nikon D200 + Sigma 70-200 F 2.8 EX DG APO HSM

Offline

 

#17 2010-05-11 19:25:12

krtekcz2000
Member
From: Birmingham, UK
Registered: 2010-05-03
Posts: 30
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

The 357 plate is part of my old Manfrotto 303 SPH head. The 357 plate is 23mm wide. The crown is 17mm wide (acording the scheme), so it makes 40mm together.
It is not easy to measure the current crown, but I guess that the gain could be slightly below 10mm.

Offline

 

#18 2010-05-11 20:30:08

bradtem
Member
Registered: 2008-11-18
Posts: 224

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

Forgive me for being a bit obtuse as I have not got my merlin delivered yet.   As I now understand it, the goal of this crown is to allow you to mount the camera closer to the arm, so that the NP can be above the center of horizontal rotation.   I presume it does that by having a deeper groove or something else?   How does the crown pictured connect to the plate/arm on which one will mount the camera?    Does the dovetail clamp that comes with the Merlin connect to this replacement crown, just closer in?      Do Manfrotto 357 dovetail bars fit in the vixen-sized dovetail clamp of the Merlin, or are they being attached to this crown in some other way, such as the Manfrotto 357 clamp?    Is the 357 larger than the arca dovetail?


I have a further problem in that I move my camera around a lot, so it has a semi-permanently mounted arca plate on the bottom of it, and I always put arca clamps on my pano-heads and tripod heads.   (As you may know, arca dovetails normally go perpendicular to the lens, not parallel as a bar on the Merlin would.)   So that plate, and the associated clamp will add 15-20mm to the "height" of the camera (distance from base of arca clamp to center of lens.)  Based on what I am reading, is this a killer, at least as far as centering the nodal point?

Now on the other hand, my main goal for the merlin is long lens gigapixel pans.  There nodal point centering is good but not as essential, I suppose.   And there is another option, namely I can use a tripod mount collar on the lens and mount the lens on the pano head rather than the camera.     I believe at 200mm the nodal point is actually not too far from the tripod collar point, though at 70mm it is a fair distance forward.

I've seen on this board a number of pointers to sites with cheap dovetail bars with holes for 1/4-20 screws in the UK.  Do people have recommended USA suppliers -- if I'm going to use such a bar at all and not need this crown?

Offline

 

#19 2010-05-11 21:03:08

mediavets
Moderator
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 9742
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

bradtem wrote:

Now on the other hand, my main goal for the merlin is long lens gigapixel pans.  There nodal point centering is good but not as essential, I suppose.   And there is another option, namely I can use a tripod mount collar on the lens and mount the lens on the pano head rather than the camera.     I believe at 200mm the nodal point is actually not too far from the tripod collar point, though at 70mm it is a fair distance forward.

Quite, when shooting gigapixel panos with long heavy lenses you are best off trying to mount the camera/lens close to the centre of mass rather than worrying too much about positioning at the NPP.

In which case you might as well mount the camera/lens via a lens collar mount using the standard L-bracket with the camera in landscape orientation.


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Nodal Ninja 4 with R-D16, Agno's MrotatorTCS short.
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket, Agno's MrotatorA.
Merlin/Orion robotic pano head + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800/N810 and Windows 8/XP/2K.

Offline

 

#20 2010-05-11 22:09:49

Paul
Member
From: Bonn, Germany
Registered: 2008-08-30
Posts: 846

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

just two quick and dirty mobile shots of the original crown

one shows that the crown can be flattened down ca. 10mm to get more clearance

one shows the crowns backside with the red plastic pad which gives more friction


Uploaded Images


Paul

close, but no cigar ... ... ...

Offline

 

#21 2010-05-11 22:27:55

bradtem
Member
Registered: 2008-11-18
Posts: 224

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

Ah, now I get it.  You swap out the original for a thinner one and you re-use the dovetail clamp.   So there would be even more options if you were replacing the crown and the clamp, in theory.

As for long lenses, while yes, you want to be at the center of gravity, you would rather not use the L bracket.  With long lenses, the longer the arms you put between the camera and the mount, the more there is to wobble, even if your arms are solid metal.   A big heavy camera and lens will still wobble, particularly if there is wind.   More wobble without wind means a longer settle time after moving, and makes mirror lock a must.   More wobble with wind just makes longer exposures impossible.   (I shoot a lot of panos at twilight, it is my favourite time to do cities, they look good even on rainy or hazy days.)

http://pic.templetons.com/cgi-bin/imget … ilight.jpg and http://pic.templetons.com/cgi-bin/imget … beve22.jpg are examples.

When using the lens collar, I might want to well put the collar right into the clamp as close as possible.  I know there are some dovetails with a 1/4-20 screw in the middle, for example.    That's the least moment arm of all.

I have come to think that the approach the gigapan pro does -- supporting the mounting from both sides -- may be the best approach when it comes to wobble.

Offline

 

#22 2010-05-11 23:55:48

mediavets
Moderator
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 9742
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

bradtem wrote:

Ah, now I get it.  You swap out the original for a thinner one and you re-use the dovetail clamp.   So there would be even more options if you were replacing the crown and the clamp, in theory.

As for long lenses, while yes, you want to be at the center of gravity, you would rather not use the L bracket.  With long lenses, the longer the arms you put between the camera and the mount, the more there is to wobble, even if your arms are solid metal.   A big heavy camera and lens will still wobble, particularly if there is wind.   More wobble without wind means a longer settle time after moving, and makes mirror lock a must.   More wobble with wind just makes longer exposures impossible.   (I shoot a lot of panos at twilight, it is my favourite time to do cities, they look good even on rainy or hazy days.)

http://pic.templetons.com/cgi-bin/imget … ilight.jpg and http://pic.templetons.com/cgi-bin/imget … beve22.jpg are examples.

When using the lens collar, I might want to well put the collar right into the clamp as close as possible.  I know there are some dovetails with a 1/4-20 screw in the middle, for example.    That's the least moment arm of all.

I have come to think that the approach the gigapan pro does -- supporting the mounting from both sides -- may be the best approach when it comes to wobble.

This is pure speculation on your part - you seem to wish to go out of your way to complicate things.

Why not try mounting your lens/camera on a lens collar attached to the standard L-bracket, with the camera in landscape orientation, and see how it performs before getting into modifying the crown because it's clear you still fail to understand what a replacement crown will, and won't, offer you.

Last edited by mediavets (2010-05-12 00:45:51)


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Nodal Ninja 4 with R-D16, Agno's MrotatorTCS short.
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket, Agno's MrotatorA.
Merlin/Orion robotic pano head + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800/N810 and Windows 8/XP/2K.

Offline

 

#23 2010-05-12 00:22:23

krtekcz2000
Member
From: Birmingham, UK
Registered: 2010-05-03
Posts: 30
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

Paul,
do you still have your head dissembled? If yes, can you please measure the total thickness of the original crown?

Offline

 

#24 2010-05-12 00:44:51

mediavets
Moderator
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 9742
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

bradtem wrote:

Ah, now I get it.  You swap out the original for a thinner one and you re-use the dovetail clamp.   So there would be even more options if you were replacing the crown and the clamp, in theory

The replacement crown from Telskop-Austria - and others made by users - does not incorporate a dovetail clamp. Instead you mount some kind of rail directly to the replacement crown.

The dovetail clamp on the original Merlin crown is an integral part of the crown.

Some people have reduced the size of the original crown by machining, or sawing, off the dovetail clamp and fixing on an alternative rail.

You can find pictures of various user modifications here:
http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/action/ … s_feedback


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Nodal Ninja 4 with R-D16, Agno's MrotatorTCS short.
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket, Agno's MrotatorA.
Merlin/Orion robotic pano head + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800/N810 and Windows 8/XP/2K.

Offline

 

#25 2010-05-12 00:46:00

mark_anderson_us
Member
From: Chicago
Registered: 2008-11-30
Posts: 202
Website

Re: Is this Teleskop-Austria Crown correct?

krtekcz2000 wrote:

The 357 plate is part of my old Manfrotto 303 SPH head. The 357 plate is 23mm wide. The crown is 17mm wide (acording the scheme), so it makes 40mm together.
It is not easy to measure the current crown, but I guess that the gain could be slightly below 10mm.

A bit confused here. Are you saying the base of the camera will be 10mm close to the motor or 10mm further away?

Regards

Mark


Canon EOS 30D with BG-E2 grip
50mm f1.4, 16-35mm f2.8L, 28-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L, 100mm f2.8 Macro
Gitzo 2531, Merlin/Orion

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson