 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| ||||||||
 |
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| 
| User list | Rules | You are not logged in.
http://hdpanorama.com/tur/3ds/
Özcan Zenginel / Türkiye
http://www.hdpanorama.com
0545 535 5000
Last edited by ozyoshow (2012-05-28 12:40:33)
Offline
Hi.. ya, I did one of those years ago.. I started with Poser, Brice 3D and then moved onto Max. I have Max 2012 and the rendering is just amazing these days.. 3D Viz is also good but Maya is the better one.. Maya is just amazing.. I thought there must be value in things like oil refinery projects, big construction with piping etc but nope.. Not one signal person or company were interested.. Just amazing.. The realism in lighting and textures maps and bump maps is just amazing... With a 3D Virtual Tour you have heaps of other options to include particle systems, smoke, fog and fire etc.... To be honest I really cannot understand why big companies cannot see value in this..
Destiny...
Last edited by Destiny (2012-05-28 13:05:20)
Offline
Destiny wrote:
To be honest I really cannot understand why big companies cannot see value in this..
"Big companies" definitely do! Visualising projects before they´re realised:
http://koebogen.info/impressionen/ (a project, we´re involved - watch the tour below the movie-window) click the movie.
http://www.sign-medienhafen.de/flash_content/start.html
In the car-industry nothing goes without - animated or still - visualisation using Maya (i use to work with Maya and Cinema4D), MaxwellRenderer, MentalRay, V-Ray and many other applications providing the actually
highest grade of visual quality. For such projects very often HDR-spheres are used for image based lighting - beneath other specialized applications for building environments of course.
Klaus
Last edited by klausesser (2012-05-28 15:23:17)
Offline
Artisan S. wrote:
The nice thing about 3D software is that you can set youre viewport to whatever lens you like
Hi Ed!
Right. But the biggest problem is to get perfect objects/constructions to work with. . 
Buying objects in perfect quality is very expensive.
Other problems are:
1) to buy and maintain the optimal software for you demands - the more you want the more expensive it becomes. The range very fast
reaches 10000.-€ and more . . very *much* more if you want to push it to the limits . . 
2) to buy adaequate hardware - that´s becoming very expensive extremely fast if you want to avoid very long editing-/render-times.
Usually the guys use clusters of very fast machines or/and stacked GPU cards in racks to render real good quality. Render-time is expensive.
best, Klaus
Offline
Artisan S. wrote:
Jeps and building object yourself, well it's a limited blessing. I once bit my teath out (literally it broke auwch), on the beautiful curve of the barcelona chair by Mies von der Rohe. I managed to satisfy me.......non the less. But doing it yourself means that you gain an intimate insight in the quality of the design......also of value I guess.
BTW Dutch build and maintained Blender is for free, and if you get your head around the horid interface rather powerfull.
Greetings, Ed
Hi!
Yes - i tried Blender some years ago. It´s good - but it´s a bit like Gimp and Photoshop . .
best, Klaus
Offline
