You are not logged in.


Pages: 1

 


#1 2010-06-05 00:00:12

Barganax
Member
Registered: 2009-05-14
Posts: 11

1.1 Gigapixel panorama of Cape Town

http://www.brianwatsonphoto.co.uk/Zoom/thumbN/Cape.jpg

Cape Town from Signal Hill: 58 exposures, handheld, with Panasonic FZ-38:
http://www.brianwatsonphoto.co.uk/Zoom/pages/Cape.html

AutoPano Pro makes it easy (thank you!), but it still takes a while!

Brian

(I originally thought this was a gigapixel image, but it isn't: I think I was confusing bytes with pixels)

Last edited by Barganax (2010-06-06 11:38:26)

Offline

 

#2 2010-06-05 18:01:54

mediavets
Moderator
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 8080
Website

Re: 1.1 Gigapixel panorama of Cape Town

It's impressive but how does 35,997 x 10,518 pixels amount to 1.1 Gigapixels?

Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm  lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Agno's Mrotator TCSshort
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800 and Windows XP/2K

Offline

 

#3 2010-06-05 18:22:59

Barganax
Member
Registered: 2009-05-14
Posts: 11

Re: 1.1 Gigapixel panorama of Cape Town

I'm clearly wrong somewhere, in an obviously stupid way...

I get "Pixel dimensions : 1.06G" in the Image Size dialogue, and the dimensions as 35977 x 10518 pixels. The PSD file is 1.08GB. Am I just confusing bytes and pixels (each of which is 3 bytes)? Is my picture only 0.38 gigapixels?

Thanks for pointing this out before I embarrass myself further,

Brian

Offline

 

#4 2010-08-03 15:22:33

DrSlony
Moderator
From: London, United Kingdom
Registered: 2007-11-03
Posts: 2198
Website

Re: 1.1 Gigapixel panorama of Cape Town

Yes, file size is related to but not decisive of image dimensions in pixels.

Offline

 

 

Pages: 1

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson