 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| ||||||||
 |
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| 
| User list | You are not logged in.
very annoying, ive not had this problem before:
shooting at mixed focal lengths, tele for the details, with wide to fill in gaps (either accidental or in the featureless sky). Normally APP2 will correctly pick the resolution of the image as that of the longer focal length, but for once it's gone for that of the wide angle filler shots. Any ideas how to force it to take it from the tele shots?
TIA
Offline
Really ? it should not. The maximal size of the panorama is always calculated on the resolution of the longest focal length.
So 100% means 1 pixel of the longest focal length is converted into 1 pixel on the final panorama.
Nevertheless, there might be some adjustment of that if the longest focal length image is not in the middle and you are using planar mode. In planar mode, at edges, the images can be distorted because of the projection. This facto is taken into account in this maximum size calculation. This may explain that behavior.
Offline
ill try a few more details:
tele focal length is at 116mm 35mm equiv, wider angle is 36mm equiv. About 50 shots at the long focal length and two at the shorter focal length.
When i give APP2 all the images it puts them together fine in cylindrical projection at about 9000x3000 pixels, if i just give it the longer focal length images with no other changes to settings etc, it goes to about 30000x10000px again in cylindrical projection. Ive used this technique seveal times now and never had it do this.
Offline
This would be a case to share with us to study the calculation behind.
Offline
i was wondering if there was any further thoughts on this, i just had another one which didnt immediately go to the resolution of the longest focal length before a bit of editing, and often other panoramas will go from the longest focal length to a shorter one after editing with e.g the crop tool...
Offline
What happened to this pano? The image were sent or not and what was the solution?
Asher
Offline
The zip was corrupted and forgot about this case. Sorry.
Offline
I'm having the same problem, and can even reproduce it with 3 files.
With 2 images (one at 400mm, the other at 135mm) it works fine, and bases the resolution on the 400mm image as expected.
However adding a 3rd image (400mm) causes it to use the 135mm image as the base, and down-scales the other 2 images.
The three images, as well as a screenshot of the problem, are here
Offline
doc wrote:
I'm having the same problem, and can even reproduce it with 3 files.
With 2 images (one at 400mm, the other at 135mm) it works fine, and bases the resolution on the 400mm image as expected.
However adding a 3rd image (400mm) causes it to use the 135mm image as the base, and down-scales the other 2 images.
The three images, as well as a screenshot of the problem, are here
So, what's the answer?
Is it possible that you could use multiple viewpoints as the entrance pupil will change for the different focal lengths?
Asher
Offline
doc wrote:
I'm having the same problem, and can even reproduce it with 3 files.
With 2 images (one at 400mm, the other at 135mm) it works fine, and bases the resolution on the 400mm image as expected.
However adding a 3rd image (400mm) causes it to use the 135mm image as the base, and down-scales the other 2 images
I've just re-tested this with APG 2.6 beta 4, and it worked perfectly!
Offline
Excellent news Doc, thanks for feedback.
Offline