![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
| User list | You are not logged in.
Claude
claudevh wrote:
"
10 mm 40D vertical ( N + 3 rows )
16 mm equiv. lenses
nadir
4 picts @ - 60°
8 picts @ 0°
4 picts @ + 60°
no zenith
"
This is my usual setting with Canon 40D and 10-17 mm
No zenit, no problem... BUT my setting of the Merlin is different, no change except displacement of the Merlin vertical head from his base (10 mm)
Claude
I'm confused - this 10-17mm is a rectilinear lens or a FE?
Your shooting technique above is for lens at 10mm with the 1.6 crop factor approximating to 16mm equiv. Is that correct?
I too am very interested to see how you mount the camera on the Merlin and achieve +60 pitch.
Offline
mediavets wrote:
fma38 wrote:
I can reach 90° only if I move the camera/lens on the sliding rail, so I'm out of NPP position. If I stay at NPP, I can't go more than 40° up (because of the body of the camera, and also because of the connector).
The circular mount was designed by Trekker317. Thierry, did you make a version with correct holes positon?This appears to be a major limitation of the Merlin head for pano photography with longer focal length lens on a DSLR IF one wishes to set the NPP properly?
I would agree that perhaps few people would us a Merlin head for 360x180 panos shooting when panos are destined for on-line display because they would probably choose to use a FE and then this would require only a few shots and a manual pano head would be more appropriate, and also they would have a smaller nadir with a manual pano head.
So it seems to me that the main use of a Merlin head will be for shooting partial panos at higher resolutions - such as landscapes from a high viewpoint?
If that assumption is correct is the limited upwards pitch that can be achieved - such as +40 in your case with a 17-40 lens on a Canon 30D - while retaining a correct NPP a real limitation, or am I making too much of this issue?
Perhaps if shooting distant landscapes for example then it does not matter very much whether the NPP is set correctly?
No. The Merlin is fine for spheres. Nobody shoots spheres with 200mm lenses . . . ![]()
I tried a 105mm and it goes 90deg up - hitting the NPP of course.
Again: nobody shoots spheres with lenses which are so long they wouldn´t fit the Merlin at 90deg upwards - therefore it´s very theoretical to discuss longer lenses for 90deg up . . .
The only problem is the footprint.
"or am I making too much of this issue?"
Yes - definitely ![]()
best, Klaus
Offline
Klaus
I'm more confused.
Frederic says he can only get +40 pitch with Canon 30D and 17-40mm lens with correct NPP.
You say you can get +90 pitch with 105mm - not sure with which body - with correct NPP. If you are using the Canon 24-105 at 105 on a fullframe body then I think the rear displacement of the camera for correct NPP is about 40mm less than with Frederic's setup?
How are you mounting your camera - can we have a photo?
..........
I agree that no-one shoots spheres with 200mm lens (at least not at the moment, but with the KRPano multi-res feature perhaps they may do in future?) but equally I don't think I'd use the Merlin to shoot spheres with a circular or fullframe FE either.
My point really was to try and understand how and why others are using the Merlin - it seemed to me that the Merlin becomes useful when one requires perhaps more than say 20 shot positions (ie. excluding bracketing) to cover the scene. Less than that and I feel that it is really not too arduous to use a manual head.
........
I'll find out for myself soon enough I guess as I've ordered nearly all the components required now - except for a box to put the RS232-TTL gizmo in and the IR shutter release gadget.
Last edited by mediavets (2008-10-13 20:55:55)
Offline
Frederic,
I will take some pictures of the very small modification of the Merlin, but not today nor tomorrow... I am out !
Sorry, I made a mistake, the objective I use isn't the 10-17 mm but the 10-22 mm EF-S and this is a rectilinear.
So at 10 mm with the 1.6 crop factor this is approximating to 16mm equiv.
This objective is quite compact and certainly much more compact than a Tele-objective. The combination with the Canon D40 and the setting allow the correct NPP and a complete freedom (full rotation for both axis)
I use this objective essentially for 360 x 180 (sphere). With Papywizard and the Merlin and Autopano, I can say that this combination is really a dream !
So the Merlin is not limited only for shooting partial panos at higher resolutions !
And I confirm that the only problem is the footprint, but there are several solutions for that.
I have also a Nodal Ninja 5 and really when I will be able to use the Merlin with the Bluetooth connection, I will probably put this beautiful Nodal Ninja 5 for sale on Ebay...
Claude![]()
Offline
Sorry Frederic but my last post is the answer to Andrew.
Claude
Offline
I understood.
Here the maximum position with my Canon 20D + EF 17-40/f4 L USM, with a correct NPP. I can reach up to 50°...
I have to move the NPP 25 mm forward to be able to reach 90° (or even 70°, the position I need to make a full-spherical pano with that lens).
Offline
mediavets wrote:
Klaus
I'm more confused.
Frederic says he can only get +40 pitch with Canon 30D and 17-40mm lens with correct NPP.
You say you can get +90 pitch with 105mm - not sure with which body - with correct NPP. If you are using the Canon 24-105 at 105 on a fullframe body then I think the rear displacement of the camera for correct NPP is about 40mm less than with Frederic's setup?
How are you mounting your camera - can we have a photo?
..........
I agree that no-one shoots spheres with 200mm lens (at least not at the moment, but with the KRPano multi-res feature perhaps they may do in future?) but equally I don't think I'd use the Merlin to shoot spheres with a circular or fullframe FE either.
My point really was to try and understand how and why others are using the Merlin - it seemed to me that the Merlin becomes useful when one requires perhaps more than say 20 shot positions (ie. excluding bracketing) to cover the scene. Less than that and I feel that it is really not too arduous to use a manual head.
........
I'll find out for myself soon enough I guess as I've ordered nearly all the components required now - except for a box to put the RS232-TTL gizmo in and the IR shutter release gadget.
Hi Andrew!
Depends on the physical dimensions of the lens - of course. Zooms usually are bigger than primes.
I can use a manual Nikon 2,5/105mm up to 90deg with staying in the NPP - without modification. Just using the rail i use for a manual 2,8/ or 3,5/20mm Nikon also.
I use the same rail for 35mm too and also for 10,5mm fisheye (i turn the rail backwards so that the lens has enough angle downsides. But the footprint is a bit big and a Nadir-shot has to be manually taken.
But for doing spheres on assignments i use a limited downlook anyway - clients sometimes find it confusing to look straight down.
I use the Merlin sometimes on a pole with the 20mm some meters elevated - you can´t get a ladder everywhere or have a rig built up. That works fine also. You definitely can´t do that with manual heads to shoot a wide-angle rectangular of several rows for highres.
For using a fisheye on a pole the Merlin also is more comfortable as twisting the pole around and trying to keep it vertical . . . .
There are DIY-heads having a longer vertical arm - but i doubt their stability is as good as the Merlin´s. My experiences are that it´s abolutely long enough.
If you want more you´d have to design one on your own - i don´t know any motorized head that provides 90deg up with remarkably longer lenses at a comparable price.
In fact i don´t know ANY motorized head at a comparable price providing the Merlin´s features.
With reduced features and versatility the Gigapan could be a choice. But it costs at least the same money as the Merlin and definitely doesn´t have the features of the Merlin. You can´t shoot spheres at all with the Gigapan.
best, Klaus
I´ll add some pictures tomorrow - have to borrow my daughter´s little Ixus for that . . ![]()
Last edited by klausesser (2008-10-13 23:44:52)
Offline
Klaus,
Thanks for the detailed reply - all very informative, helpful and much appreciated.
I look forward to seeing some photos of your setup and the rail system you are using to mount lenses on the Merlin. I have a few vague ideas of how I might do it but it would be good to learn from those with hands-on experience - as Isaac Newton put it, "to stand on the shoulders of Giants" (http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/268025.html).
Very interesting to learn of your use of the Merlin on a pole - must be a pretty strong pole! And you must be very courageous or at least have lot of confidence in the pole.
I'm certain you are correct in saying there is nothing to match the Merlin at the price. If the manufacturer's realised that it is useful for pano photography I'm sure they could make a variant specifically targeting that market and charge twice as much - perhaps we should keep quiet about it!![]()
I did consider a Gigapan unit before choosing to go with the Merlin. I think it is quite well thought out (as a concept) but the Gigapan unit looks so frail and it is really only suitable for use with a compact camera - I have one, a Nikon P5100, but that's not really ideal for Gigapan it seems, and anyway should I wish to I'm sure I could mount that on a Merlin.
Last edited by mediavets (2008-10-14 00:03:09)
Offline
klausesser wrote:
I´ll add some pictures tomorrow - have to borrow my daughter´s little Ixus for that . .
Funny, I do the same with my son, borrowing its Lumix (FZ2) ![]()
Offline
mediavets wrote:
I look forward to seeing some photos of your setup and the rail system you are using to mount lenses on the Merlin. I have a few vague ideas of how I might do it but it would be good to learn from those with hands-on experience - as Isaac Newton put it, "to stand on the shoulders of Giants" (http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/268025.html).
Very interesting to learn of your use of the Merlin on a pole - must be a pretty strong pole! And you must be very courageous or at least have lot of confidence in the pole.
Andrew - the merlin comes with an right-angled (?) rail (?). Unmount the angle and you get one straight rail.
Attach the camera with a camera-screw so that the camera sits right-angled on the rail.
Turn the dovetail of the head horizontal and slide the rail into it.
The camera now sits in portrait-mode attached to the vertical moving part of the Merlin and is nearly perfectly vertical aligned - with my 20D it´s one or two millimeters beneath it. So you can use a modified - as Frédéric does - turning plate to put a Manfrotto rail-holder on.
But it works already by using just the "primitive" version without any modification besides to detach the angled rail. ![]()
Offline
fma38 wrote:
klausesser wrote:
I´ll add some pictures tomorrow - have to borrow my daughter´s little Ixus for that . .
Funny, I do the same with my son, borrowing its Lumix (FZ2)
let´s be thankfull to the kids . . ![]()
and for their photographical ambitions!
good nite, Klaus
Offline
Frederic
I am trying to choose which of the GentleLED devices to use to trigger the shutter of my Nikon D40 DSLR (which does not have the option of a wired remote and does not have AEB) from the Merlin head using Papywizard to control the head:
http://www.gentles.ltd.uk/gentled/options.htm
I read this in the Papywizard documentation:
"Delays ¶
There are two delays to set in the configuration dialog: Stabilization delay and Time value.
The first one is the delay between the end of the move end the effective shooting. Depending of the tripod used, the head can start shaking while moving. So, it maye need a long delay before it stabilizes again. This is especially true if the head is on a long pole.
The second delay mainly depends of the exposure time of the camera; it should be longer that this time. Take into account the total time of the shooting cycle, which is longer that the exposure time alone.
Note that the shutter trigger remains on during all the Time value; if the camera AF mode is on, use a much longer delay to let it complete its AF cycle. "
I'm not sure what the last paragraph means - would this mean that the LED on the Gentle device would be lit for the entire duration of the Time value?
I'm guessing that the 'switch' in the Merlin head which outputs to the camera remote cable is a normally open type?
What exactly happens (electrically speaking) when under Papywizard control the head fires the camera via acables connection between the head and the camera - as in the case of a Canon body?
I think that if I better understood (in simple terms) how the head triggers the wired remote cable then I could talk to the maker of the Gentle devices and seek his advice.
I'm also considering one of their Nikon serial devices for use with my ancient Nikon CP5000 compact - which does have AEB - on the Merlin. Do you think this could be made to work? I thought one could take 5V from then Tronisoft serial-TTL device?:
http://www.gentles.ltd.uk/gentled/Manual-serial.pdf
Last edited by mediavets (2008-10-14 10:33:55)
Offline
mediavets wrote:
Frederic
I am trying to choose which of the GentleLED dvices to use to trigger the shutter of my Nikon DSLR from the Merlin head using Papywizard to control the head:
http://www.gentles.ltd.uk/gentled/options.htm
I think you need this one:
http://www.gentles.ltd.uk/gentled/options.htm#IRjump
It can be triggered by an external contact (relay).
Note that the shutter trigger remains on during all the Time value; if the camera AF mode is on, use a much longer delay to let it complete its AF cycle. "
I'm not sure what the last paragraph means - would this mean that the LED on the Gentle decvice would be lit for the entire duration of the Time value?
I don't know how the Gentle will react: does it let the led on during all the time, or does it send a pulse? If you dont' use the AF mode, this does not matter: the camera only needs a pulse. But if you want it to do AF and then shoot, you need to keep the shutter on during all the AF cycle.
You should ask Gentle to know how it works.
I'm guessing that the 'switch' in the Merlin head which outputs to the camera remote cable is a normally open type?
What exactly happens (electrically speaking) when under Papywizard control the head fires the camera via a cable connection between the head and the camera - as in the case of a Canon body?
The Merlin output is a opto-coupleur, so acts like a relay contact. Most DSLR, not only Canon, have a input for remote shuttering. You just need to wire 2 contacts to take the picture. Some DSLR only have a IR input, so you need a device like Gentle one.
Offline
fma38 wrote:
mediavets wrote:
Frederic
I am trying to choose which of the GentleLED dvices to use to trigger the shutter of my Nikon DSLR from the Merlin head using Papywizard to control the head:
http://www.gentles.ltd.uk/gentled/options.htmI think you need this one:
http://www.gentles.ltd.uk/gentled/options.htm#IRjump
It can be triggered by an external contact (relay).Note that the shutter trigger remains on during all the Time value; if the camera AF mode is on, use a much longer delay to let it complete its AF cycle. "
I'm not sure what the last paragraph means - would this mean that the LED on the Gentle decvice would be lit for the entire duration of the Time value?I don't know how the Gentle will react: does it let the led on during all the time, or does it send a pulse? If you dont' use the AF mode, this does not matter: the camera only needs a pulse. But if you want it to do AF and then shoot, you need to keep the shutter on during all the AF cycle.
You should ask Gentle to know how it works.I'm guessing that the 'switch' in the Merlin head which outputs to the camera remote cable is a normally open type?
What exactly happens (electrically speaking) when under Papywizard control the head fires the camera via a cable connection between the head and the camera - as in the case of a Canon body?The Merlin output is a opto-coupleur, so acts like a relay contact. Most DSLR, not only Canon, have a input for remote shuttering. You just need to wire 2 contacts to take the picture. Some DSLR only have a IR input, so you need a device like Gentle one.
I've ordered the GentleJUMP but now I don't think it will work, this is what it says in the manual (http://www.gentles.ltd.uk/gentled/Manual-jump.pdf):
"With a switch connected at the mono 2.5mm jack socket the unit triggers
the camera every time it is switched on. The switch connects the battery
to the unit so no current is drawn when the switch isn’t pressed. Point A
can be connected to any switch, e.g. a Mouth or tongue switch, a PIR
sensor, a pressure mat, the possibilities are endless! Red LED C flashes
every time the shutter signal is sent.The switch must remain closed until
the red LED flashes (about 0.5seconds) to ensure the IR signal is sent."
If the Merlin 'switch' is an opto-coupler then it will not pass current will it?
Also it will automatically repeat if the switch remains closed - at a rate of either 0.5 secs. or 2.5 secs. - that's not really desirable for our purposes is it?
What do you think?
.............
If you could tell me what happens when the standard cable is used to a Canon camera - I mean what gets sent down the cable while the switch is closed - then maybe I could discuss this with the guy at Gentles?
Last edited by mediavets (2008-10-14 17:19:51)
Offline
I think all is OK. The Merlin opto-couleur acts as a switch. That's exactly what is needed for the GentleIR hardware.
About the repeat, you should set the Papywizard Tv parameter to a value lower than that (< 0,5 s or < 2,5 s, depending on the internal link) so there is only 1 shutter cycle (Papywizard can take several shots at the same position).
So, don't worry, it will work ![]()
Offline
Frederic
fma38 wrote:
I think all is OK. The Merlin opto-couleur acts as a switch. That's exactly what is needed for the GentleIR hardware.
About the repeat, you should set the Papywizard Tv parameter to a value lower than that (< 0,5 s or < 2,5 s, depending on the internal link) so there is only 1 shutter cycle (Papywizard can take several shots at the same position).
So, don't worry, it will work
Here is the reply I got from James Gentle:
"Because of the way gentLED-JUMP was designed to avoid having an on-off
switch, the switch to trigger the camera is actually the on-off switch, I
dont know if an opto-coupler would trigger it. It might.
A better solution would be gentLED-SHUTTER, BUT this will only work if
there is a 3V to 6V supply available beside the output for the camera.
If you are really fortunate plugging the stereo 2,5 jack for the Canon
into JUMP will work but don't hold your breath.
So: If there is 3V to 6V present I can change the order to gentLED-SHUTTER
(it's a cheaper solution too).
If not I'll process your jump order and I'm happy to work with you to get
it working then look at customising if necessary."
I told him to go ahead and ship me the gentLED_JUMP - with luck between us we'll get it to work.
But if we can't then we can fall back to using the gentLED-SHUTTER and tap 5V from the Tronisoft 4201 module to power it. That might be quite aneat solution although it would make the cabling a little more complex.
Thanks for your help so far - I'm going to need a lot more soon when all the bits and pieces arrive!
Offline
Frederic
More thoughts and information from James Gentle regarding the use of the gentLED-JUMP IR shutter trigger device:
"The device needs a mono 2.5mm jack. Inside the black box tip is connected to the battery and sleeve to the gentLED circuit.
Thinking about it it should work but the collector of the NPN optocoupler needs to goto tip and the emitter to sleeve.
The current drawn is much less than 1mA but when the IR LED starts to flash it will draw 20mA with a duty cycle of 50%. So the optocoupler needs to be rated at least 20mA. The voltage drop across the optocoupler at 0.2V shouldn't be an issue. As the battery drops in terminal voltage the IR signal gets weaker (so we are at 2.8V already), but it works down to 2volts. The fact the range reduces isn't a problem as in your (and all my target) application(s) range isn't important. With appropriate mounting (even at right angles to the sensor) you only need a few inches of range. At 5V the range is over 1metre.
When the power is applied the following happens:
1. Wait 40mS for power supply to settle, switch debounce, etc,
2. After a further 40mS the Nikon pulse is sent,
3. During the next 1 second various other camera pulses are sent (One device can operate many cameras!) these are ignored by the Nikon which is busy taking a picture. They would be ignored anyway
4. This sequence either repeats immediately or after 3 seconds which is set by an internal link
So, to work the optocoupler needs to be on for AT LEAST 80mS and LESS THAN 3 seconds. Some of this timing can be changed if necessary.
Let me know how you get on! This is an interesting market."
He later sent this additional revised information:
"Reading the microcontroller manual again the timing is actually
20mS to power-on
40mS delay for stabilisation, recovery from switch-on and switch debounce
40mS to send IR pulses
So the opto-coupler must be on for at least 100mS, and less than 3 seconds."
...........
What do you think of this?
Offline
No problem; I set the opto-coupleur during 'Tv' sec; as you can set this value with a 0.1 s accuracy, from 0.1 to 100.0 s ![]()
Offline
fma38 wrote:
No problem; I set the opto-coupleur during 'Tv' sec; as you can set this value with a 0.1 s accuracy, from 0.1 to 100.0 s
Would the 'less than 3 secs' mean that I could not use an exposure of longer than that?
Regarding the mono 2.5 jack that he says is required do you know how the Merlin camera cable is wired - he says that when wiring the mono end for the gentllED-JUMP then I will need to make sure that "the collector of the NPN optocoupler needs to goto tip and the emitter to sleeve".
Offline
mediavets wrote:
Would the 'less than 3 secs' mean that I could not use an exposure of longer than that?
No; a long exposure does not need you keep your finger on the shutter button. A pulse is enough to start the exposure.
Regarding the mono 2.5 jack that he says is required do you know how the Merlin camera cable is wired - he says that when wiring the mono end for the gentllED-JUMP then I will need to make sure that "the collector of the NPN optocoupler needs to goto tip and the emitter to sleeve".
It depends of the opto-coupleur; it may have 2 circuits, which allow the current to go in both directions. And even if it is not the case, you will just have to cut the cable and cross the wires.
As I said, if you have troubles, I will help you, for example, making a new cable or add a little circuit if needed.
Offline
Hmmmmm.......got all the bits and pieces now (except for a box to put the Tronisoft 4201 in).
But......when I unpacked my Merlin mount and went to fit some batteries I found that the battery holders are missing - GRRRRRR!
Supplier is closed on Wednesdays so cannot follow up until tomorrow - very frustrating.
I have a 12V 500ma external mains power adapter is that adequate to power the Merlin?
Just holding up my camera, a Nikon D40 which is rather small as DSLRs go, to the mount it appears that one could not position it at the NPP laterally/side-to-side with the standard mounting boss/clamp.
Looking again at the pictures of Frederic's setup it appears to have a custom made boss and then (Ithink) a Manfrotto 357 sliding plate adapter mounted on that?
What do others do?
Last edited by mediavets (2008-10-15 20:38:44)
Offline
I can understand your frustation! Not being able to play with your new toy, just because of missing batteries... Try to do that to your chilrdren at Christmas ![]()
About your power supply, you can try it, it may be enough. Motors don't drain much current (150 mA each).
About the NPP, start to use the Merlin without too much modifications; except for indoor full-spherical panos, it is not a big problem.
Offline
fma38 wrote:
About the NPP, start to use the Merlin without too much modifications; except for indoor full-spherical panos, it is not a big problem.
here you can see my "modification": i just removed one rail of the "L" and put the camera onto the remaining single rail.
It works perfect - even indoors - with a 35mm, 28mm, 20mm and 18mm Nikkor lens.
The only additional item is a flatter camera-screw (mine is too big - but i only need a flatter one for very short lenses to push the rail further into the dovetail.
best, Klaus
P.S.: i´ll do the modification which Frédéric did: a flatter attachment-plate than the dovetail.
With that the "last millimeter" will be aligned.
Last edited by klausesser (2008-10-15 23:20:00)
Offline
Klaus,
Thanks for the photos. I'm keen to try that.
But how did you get the original screw out of the rail?
Last edited by mediavets (2008-10-15 23:22:43)
Offline
mediavets wrote:
Klaus,
Thanks for the photos. I'm keen to try that.
But how did you get the original screw out of the rail?
Don´t remember - i fizzeled some minutes . . and suddenly it was very easy. But i really can´t remember what i did precisely . . .
But you can destroy it - you wouldn´t need it anyway.
P.S.: you need a very much flatter screw even as was looking for it when i wanted to shoot ihe pictures.
A flatter one allowes to slide the rail more into the dovetail without being stopped.
But you need that only when usind a verya short lens or a fisheye.
better - as i said before - is the way Frédéric went to change the plate with the dovetail-mount to a flatter one with screw-holes to attach a Manfrotto slider or something like that.
good nite, Klaus
Last edited by klausesser (2008-10-16 00:40:22)
Offline
Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
|
CHOOSING KOLOR Why choose Kolor? Which solution to choose? Download a trial Where can I buy? Education |
SOFTWARE Autopano Pro Autopano Giga Panotour Panotour Pro XnView |
ACCESSORIES Training DVD Panobook PROJECTS Paris 26 Gigapixels Yosemite 17 Gigapixels |
COMMUNITY Forums Blog |
COMPANY About Kolor Corporate blog Resellers Contact |
PRESS Press center Press review TOOLS My account |
