![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
| User list | Rules | You are not logged in.
i try to follow http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/action/ … low_case_E
the documentation seems not to be based at version 3.0, but ok
I have loaded a group of 112 RAW/CR2-images divided by stacks of 7. When I detect the group and open it in the editor, in color mode the HDR option is grayed out. Any idea anyone why this is and how to solve it?
Offline
confirm this. I followed Case E with tiff and with CR2 source files manually grouped by N=5 files. using the hard links and all other mentioned settings in all cases the HDR was disabled after detection.
Georg
PS: I correctd the type in the Case-E wiki entry. now http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/images- … links1.jpg is correct displayed in the wiki.
Last edited by gkaefer (2013-01-07 18:36:18)
Offline
HansKeesom wrote:
i try to follow http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/action/ … low_case_E
the documentation seems not to be based at version 3.0, but ok
I have loaded a group of 112 RAW/CR2-images divided by stacks of 7. When I detect the group and open it in the editor, in color mode the HDR option is grayed out. Any idea anyone why this is and how to solve it?
Hans:
1) the RAW decoder in APG is not the very best one. So i suggest to use Lightroom (has the ARC integrated) or - the best one - CaptureOne as RAW converter.
2) also i strongly suggest to use Photomatix or a familiar, dedicated application to generate HDR with tonemapping - and only then put the resulting output-images (preferably TIFF/16bit) into APG.
That depends on what you need HDR for: tonemapping on usual photography or HDR-probes for IBL in 3D-applications like Maya, Cinema4D, Max and so on or as for dedicated renderers like Maxwell or so.
Just my friendly advise as a photographer using APG and HDR for years now and sharing his experiences. Using already RAW processed and/or HDR processed images in APG makes APG dramatically faster and easier to run.
I had a run with APG 3.0 an hour ago with a set of 6 shots x7 brackets testing the "Fusion" feature. It works. But in a somewhat "clandestine operational" way - i didn´t know what it sxactly did when i used the sliders . . so it was kind of try and error. The result wasn´t too bad - but not good enough. I´m quite sure one can get wonderful results with it nevertheless . . having plenty of time.
best, Klaus
Offline
klausesser wrote:
HansKeesom wrote:
i try to follow http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/action/ … low_case_E
the documentation seems not to be based at version 3.0, but ok
I have loaded a group of 112 RAW/CR2-images divided by stacks of 7. When I detect the group and open it in the editor, in color mode the HDR option is grayed out. Any idea anyone why this is and how to solve it?Hans:
1) the RAW decoder in APG is not the very best one. So i suggest to use Lightroom (has the ARC integrated) or - the best one - CaptureOne as RAW converter.
2) also i strongly suggest to use Photomatix or a familiar, dedicated application to generate HDR with tonemapping - and only then put the resulting output-images (preferably TIFF/16bit) into APG.
That depends on what you need HDR for: tonemapping on usual photography or HDR-probes for IBL in 3D-applications like Maya, Cinema4D, Max and so on or as for dedicated renderers like Maxwell or so.
Just my friendly advise as a photographer using APG and HDR for years now and sharing his experiences. Using already RAW processed and/or HDR processed images in APG makes APG dramatically faster and easier to run.
I had a run with APG 3.0 an hour ago with a set of 6 shots x7 brackets testing the "Fusion" feature. It works. But in a somewhat "clandestine operational" way - i didn´t know what it sxactly did when i used the sliders . . so it was kind of try and error. The result wasn´t too bad - but not good enough. I´m quite sure one can get wonderful results with it nevertheless . . having plenty of time.
best, Klaus
case E is handling an HDR output (.exr or .hdr panorama file). so following the description we've now 3 conclusions we can choose from:
1. the docu is outdated and not reflecting 3.0.x version
2. we dont understand the docu so we do expect other things to happen
3. docu is correct and we understand it so the autopano 3.0.1 does have a bug.
Georg
Offline
thank you Georg,
These are exactly the points. One should be able to follow the manual and get the same results. I was trying to learn some new things. Was not expecting to learn not to follow the documentation,
Guess I need to have a look at the other cases , F seem to be the way to go
Last edited by HansKeesom (2013-01-07 22:30:53)
Offline
Sorrry for being so negative here, but i have given up using HDR with APG.
I use a similar process to Hans, and I would second his experience and tools of choice - but then I also have all those programs incl Capture One which lately has been very tempermental.
Henrik
Offline
Actually, HDR color correction is based on EXIF information. "Speed" and "FNumber" values are required.
So, if you don't have these EXIF info, HDR color correction is disabled.
Offline
HansKeesom wrote:
i try to follow http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/action/ … low_case_E
the documentation seems not to be based at version 3.0, but ok
I have loaded a group of 112 RAW/CR2-images divided by stacks of 7. When I detect the group and open it in the editor, in color mode the HDR option is grayed out. Any idea anyone why this is and how to solve it?
I cannot replicate your problem.
I always get all three colour options highlighted (None, Auto, HDR) whatever options I select and even if not using bracketing or fusion.
I am using 3.0.1 full licence under Windows 7
(The results I get are unfotunately less successful though)
Online
renan wrote:
Actually, HDR color correction is based on EXIF information. "Speed" and "FNumber" values are required.
So, if you don't have these EXIF info, HDR color correction is disabled.
ok. in my case I used images without EXIF data. so case so far closed... ;-)
please check the wiki page. I updated your information and added a footnote to the manual:
http://www.autopano.net/wiki-en/action/ … w_it_works
Georg
Offline
renan wrote:
Actually, HDR color correction is based on EXIF information. "Speed" and "FNumber" values are required.
So, if you don't have these EXIF info, HDR color correction is disabled.
This might be caused then by the cheap Samyang 8 mm I am using........... Oke, maybe time to test everything with a real Canon lens.
Last edited by HansKeesom (2013-01-09 16:37:14)
Offline
I agree with Klaus for the HDR process. I spend a good amount of time finding the best one and this is what I'm doing (my purpose is to create full 360x180° panoramas for usage in 3D software, no tonemapping)
- Doing the Raw development in Lightroom and export as 16 bits tiff files.
- Creating the HDR file from these Tiff files in Photomatix (just the batch HDR creation with antighost)
- I open my resulting HDR in photoshop to see if the default exposure value is fine (sometime too dark or too bright and do the same adjustment on all the HDR files.
- Loading these HDR in AGP
- Define my various settings to create my pano (see case F)
- Render my pano as HDR with the additional stitched images
- Doing various edits in photoshop. I'm using Flexify 2 to "rotate" my pano to edit the nadir.
FYI, I'm using the 2nd order + geometric center option for the Distorsion model in the pano settings, always in high quality detection with the maximum control points and the robust algorithm + final optimisation. I always add the control points with a RMS < 4.
I'll be happy to know other users workflow or tips and tricks... Or ways to reduce as much as possible the wrong image overlaps between stiched images.
Offline
renan wrote:
Actually, HDR color correction is based on EXIF information. "Speed" and "FNumber" values are required.
So, if you don't have these EXIF info, HDR color correction is disabled.
I have been up all night so apologies if this is stupid question, but "speed" refers to shutter speed? If so then I don't understand how it would make sense for a .hdr file to have an associated shutter speed (unless I bought an HDR camera). If I make a .hdr file from three images taken with the same f/ number but different shutter speeds, then it makes sense to me that the f/ number should be copied across to the .hdr file, but not a shutter speed.
So, under what circumstances would a .hdr file have a "speed"?
Last edited by Aeriscera (2013-03-01 08:22:34)
Offline
I use a fixed f-number and ISO but vary the shutter speed when I do fully manual bracketing
Also I think some cameras with HDR or AEB functions effectively take each stack (set) of pano images on "Auto" so across the whole pano any exif variable could change in theory
Online
Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
|
CHOOSING KOLOR Why choose Kolor? Which solution to choose? Download a trial Where can I buy? Education |
SOFTWARE Autopano Pro Autopano Giga Panotour Panotour Pro XnView |
ACCESSORIES Training DVD Panobook PROJECTS Paris 26 Gigapixels Yosemite 17 Gigapixels |
COMMUNITY Forums YouTube channel Google+ |
COMPANY Blog About Kolor Resellers Contact Visit us |
PRESS Press center Press review TOOLS My account |
