 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| ||||||||
 |
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| 
| User list | Rules | You are not logged in.
I just upgraded to Giga 3.0, and wanted to have a try on older Panos saved with 2.6, results were quite unexpected. (attached Thumnails) 
I suppose that with the new version all should be reworked ? Starting all over by just selecting pictures, letting AP automatically stitch didn't give better results.
Any tip for 360 Panos ? Things to consider ? Thanks
Offline
What you see should not happen, but we can understand not every situation has been tested by kolor. They problably like to receive your set of photos.
Is the second image what you see in the editor, after pressing preview or after generating?
If you really want to reload old projects you might indeed wanna redo the detection phase and keep an good eye on whether the lens information is read correctly. Sometimes a fisheye is not seen as such or the opposite.
Last edited by HansKeesom (2012-12-09 11:39:24)
Offline
You're right 
there were some adjustments to make, and where AP2.6 'recognised all picture as Fisheye, AP 3.0 didn't. So I finally tried several settings, and it came out that setting all pict to Standard (I used a 9mm Micro 4/3 ) turns out to give very good results. Thanks for the input 
Offline
And I'm astonished by the speed and flexibility improvements over 2.6 (Linux) version
Offline
and if you use preview button in apg 3.0 final. is this effect still visible? or is your second screenshot the final render?
Georg
Offline
It was the preview, I didn'render it as it was not satisfactory, but yes I tried preview and funnily that worked out fine, weird . Anyway now I get good results
Offline
Sorry I meant before preview it was not OK, just after pressing preview it went OK, maybe some corrections to make in the pre-preview
Offline
